To Be Filled By O.E.M.

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 32%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 30%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 66%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics34% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive151% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (24%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardTo Be Filled By O.E.M.  (all builds)
Memory27.4 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191029
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 23:53
Run Duration223 Seconds
Run User BRA-User
Background CPU 24%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2650 v2
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.6 GHz, turbo 2.85 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
66% Good
Memory 75.6
1-Core 63.7
2-Core 139
55% 92.7 Pts
4-Core 303
8-Core 563
52% 433 Pts
64-Core 831
51% 831 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 66%
Great: 73%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3001) 3GB
CLim: 1000 MHz, MLim: 1500 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide
34% Below average
Lighting 47.5
Reflection 31.9
Parallax 53.9
39% 44.4 fps
MRender 28.6
Gravity 43.2
Splatting 22
25% 31.3 fps
Poor: 31%
This bench: 34%
Great: 39%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kllisre 256GB 256GB
128GB free (System drive)
Firmware: T1102A0L
SusWrite @10s intervals: 634 572 586 513 541 417 MB/s
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
151% Outstanding
Read 1521
Write 937
Mixed 857
SusWrite 544
214% 965 MB/s
4K Read 37.6
4K Write 79.3
4K Mixed 21.5
126% 46.1 MB/s
DQ Read 452
DQ Write 440
DQ Mixed 479
351% 457 MB/s
Poor: 61%
This bench: 151%
Great: 184%
Disco Virtual da Microsoft 86GB
10GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.2 9.3 19 25 25 25 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
26.2% Poor
Read 69.9
Write 29.7
Mixed 30.8
SusWrite 18
27% 37.1 MB/s
4K Read 6.1
4K Write 5.5
4K Mixed 3.2
712% 4.93 MB/s
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.2%
Great: 54%
Seagate Expansion 500GB
101GB free
Firmware: 0637
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 31 29 29 29 32 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
33.6% Below average
Read 87.1
Write 43.4
Mixed 35.3
SusWrite 29.8
36% 48.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 33.6%
Great: 62%
Seagate BACKUP+ 500GB
112GB free
Firmware: 0143
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 107 109 107 108 109 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
59% Above average
Read 99.6
Write 71.7
Mixed 55.6
SusWrite 106
61% 83.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
132% 1 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 59%
Great: 62%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2018)-$50
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 194 203 213 201 204 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
83.5% Excellent
Read 91.6
Write 128
Mixed 67.7
SusWrite 200
89% 122 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.1
80% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 83.5%
Great: 106%
Disco Virtual da Microsoft 107GB
11GB free
Firmware: 1.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.7 10 18 25 25 25 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 7% Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1866 C10 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
106% Outstanding
MC Read 46.8
MC Write 40
MC Mixed 42.5
123% 43.1 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 9.9
SC Mixed 9.6
33% 11.5 GB/s
Latency 89.1
45% 89.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 106%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 48: 6R 6G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
48% 60% 20 107 7 72 27" 1920 1080 SAM0D36 C27F591
Typical Be Filled By O.E.M. Builds (Compare 5,632 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: To Be Filled By O.E.M.

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $87
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $289WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback