Gigabyte GA-Z490 VISION G

Performance Results


Gaming 101% UFO	Desktop 103% UFO	Workstation 110% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (69th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 31 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 100%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics	98.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	315% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-Z490 VISION G (all builds)
Memory	60.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors, 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210311
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 26 '21 at 17:53
Run Duration	280 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	1%

Watch Gameplay: 2060S + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i9-10900 50 User benchmarks, average bench 99% , 1 CPU, 10 cores, 20 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 4.7 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (64^th percentile)	100% Outstanding	Memory 86.8 1-Core 156 2-Core 312 100% 185 Pts	4-Core 608 8-Core 1,155 105% 882 Pts	64-Core 1,986 123% 1,986 Pts
Poor: 88% ↑ This bench: 100% Great: 105%

Graphics Cards	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10
Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super)-$510 319,148 User benchmarks, average bench 100% Gigabyte(1458 3FF1) CLim: 2145 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing below potential (41^st percentile) - GPU OC Guide	98.7% Outstanding	Lighting 118 Reflection 170 Parallax 123 96% 137 fps	MRender 180 Gravity 108 Splatting 103 103% 130 fps
Poor: 90% ↑ This bench: 98.7% Great: 106%
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% Gigabyte(1458 372A) CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	33.3% Below average	Lighting 43.4 Reflection 49 Parallax 40.4 35% 44.3 fps	MRender 38.2 Gravity 43.4 Splatting 28.5 29% 36.7 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 33.3% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$98 455,997 User benchmarks, average bench 310% 733GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1823 1674 1676 1648 1479 1356 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	315% Outstanding	Read 2,533 Write 2,346 Mixed 1,682 SusWrite 1609 458% 2,042 MB/s	4K Read 54.4 4K Write 140 4K Mixed 73.8 251% 89.3 MB/s	DQ Read 1,158 DQ Write 531 DQ Mixed 443 435% 711 MB/s
Poor: 188% ↑ This bench: 315% Great: 410%
PNY CS900 240GB-$20 61,417 User benchmarks, average bench 73% 91GB free Firmware: CS900208 SusWrite @10s intervals: 285 210 210 209 209 210 MB/s Performing as expected (56^th percentile)	77.4% Very good	Read 411 Write 443 Mixed 317 SusWrite 222 78% 348 MB/s	4K Read 28.8 4K Write 83.2 4K Mixed 25.9 121% 46 MB/s	DQ Read 178 DQ Write 328 DQ Mixed 145 141% 217 MB/s
Poor: 43% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 91%
HP S700 500GB-$60 12,813 User benchmarks, average bench 71% 172GB free Firmware: S0704A1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 431 420 420 421 422 425 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	105% Outstanding	Read 514 Write 413 Mixed 422 SusWrite 423 100% 443 MB/s	4K Read 36.3 4K Write 93.1 4K Mixed 35 149% 54.8 MB/s	DQ Read 294 DQ Write 306 DQ Mixed 57 110% 219 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 100%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 250GB 28,058 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 135GB free Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 422 314 313 312 311 313 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	115% Outstanding	Read 506 Write 469 Mixed 400 SusWrite 331 96% 426 MB/s	4K Read 41.7 4K Write 97.9 4K Mixed 56 187% 65.2 MB/s	DQ Read 379 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 350 264% 355 MB/s
Poor: 73% ↑ This bench: 115% Great: 122%
WD easystore 2624 2TB 60 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 472GB free, PID 2624 Operating at USB 3.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 69 68 69 69 69 69 MB/s Relative performance (0^th percentile)	24% Poor	Read 40.1 Write 28.2 Mixed 36.2 SusWrite 69 60% 43.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.5 52% 0.6 MB/s
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 24% Great: 64%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD 029E CMW32GX4M2C3200C16 Crucial BLS16G4D240FSE.16FBD 64GB 5 User benchmarks, average bench 77% 2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz 16384, 16384, 16384, 16384 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	76.8% Very good	MC Read 26.7 MC Write 29.8 MC Mixed 23.8 76% 26.8 GB/s	SC Read 16.9 SC Write 34 SC Mixed 26.2 73% 25.7 GB/s	Latency 70.6 57% 70.6 ns
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 76.8% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	60	27"	1280 720	AOC2790 U2790B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-Z490 VISION G Builds (Compare 2,144 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 144%

UFO

Desktop 101%

UFO

Workstation 143%

UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z490 VISION G

CPU
Core i7-10700KIntel $220Bench 97%, 198,859 samples	708x
Core i9-10850KIntel $279Bench 99%, 84,873 samples	335x
Core i9-10900KIntel $440Bench 100%, 107,269 samples	241x

GPU
RTX 3070Nvidia $400Bench 148%, 619,642 samples	376x
RTX 3080Nvidia $910Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	321x
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	123x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $98Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	161x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $151Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	100x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	85x

RAM
CMW16GX4M2C3200C16 4x8GBCorsairBench 92%, 92,358 samples	137x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBCorsair $116Bench 89%, 144,399 samples	93x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $56Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	72x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 96% - Outstanding

Total price: $717

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16