Acer Aspire F5-573G

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics12.6% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive79.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (51%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemAcer Aspire F5-573G  (all builds)
MotherboardAcer Captain_SK
Memory10 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben, 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161021
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 16:53
Run Duration151 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 51%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-7200U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
50.5% Above average
Memory 62.7
1-Core 89.3
2-Core 147
58% 99.6 Pts
4-Core 223
8-Core 224
30% 223 Pts
64-Core 234
14% 234 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 50.5%
Great: 58%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 950M
Acer(1025 108F) ≥ 4GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 22.21.13.8199
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
12.6% Very poor
Lighting 14.9
Reflection 16.4
Parallax 12.6
12% 14.6 fps
MRender 19.8
Gravity 18.1
Splatting 12.8
13% 16.9 fps
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.6%
Great: 16%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
HFS512G39TND-N210A 512GB
118GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 30001P10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 343 332 236 286 243 262 MB/s
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
79.9% Very good
Read 365
Write 399
Mixed 242
SusWrite 284
73% 323 MB/s
4K Read 24.9
4K Write 69.6
4K Mixed 25.8
108% 40.1 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 321
DQ Mixed 242
210% 313 MB/s
Poor: 59%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 95%
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
931GB free
Firmware: ACM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 103 125 128 127 127 127 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69% Good
Read 117
Write 121
Mixed 57
SusWrite 123
76% 105 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.8
203% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 69%
Great: 71%
SMI USB DISK 32GB
5GB free, PID null
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 123
Write 83.9
Mixed 62.1
105% 89.7 MB/s
4K Read 8.6
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 2.9
182% 4.33 MB/s
Poor: 4% Great: 33%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4SFRA266.M8FRS 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
48.2% Average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 19
MC Mixed 10.6
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 11
SC Write 18.9
SC Mixed 17.8
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 120
33% 120 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 48.2%
Great: 86%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Aspire F5-573G Builds (Compare 1,624 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk

System: Acer Aspire F5-573G

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback