PC STRIX Z270I GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 73%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 89%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 63%
Destroyer
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics80.6% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive190% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemPC STRIX Z270I GAMING  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK STRIX Z270I GAMING
Memory27.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 26 '21 at 09:34
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
84% Excellent
Memory 91.1
1-Core 97.1
2-Core 228
78% 139 Pts
4-Core 414
8-Core 672
67% 543 Pts
64-Core 666
41% 666 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 84%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$278
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (66th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
80.6% Excellent
Lighting 99.4
Reflection 110
Parallax 112
81% 107 fps
MRender 96.2
Gravity 97.9
Splatting 97.8
80% 97.3 fps
Poor: 71%
This bench: 80.6%
Great: 88%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$140
213GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 618 647 644 639 614 440 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
190% Outstanding
Read 1,987
Write 1,631
Mixed 622
SusWrite 600
268% 1,210 MB/s
4K Read 39.2
4K Write 98.1
4K Mixed 53.5
180% 63.6 MB/s
DQ Read 410
DQ Write 378
DQ Mixed 289
246% 359 MB/s
Poor: 153%
This bench: 190%
Great: 254%
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$110
299GB free
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 425 444 280 122 119 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 436
Write 397
Mixed 374
SusWrite 280
84% 372 MB/s
4K Read 43.5
4K Write 82.3
4K Mixed 56.3
182% 60.7 MB/s
DQ Read 378
DQ Write 337
DQ Mixed 360
269% 358 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 107%
Great: 133%
Jmicron Tech 1TB
906GB free
Firmware: 0209
SusWrite @10s intervals: 243 358 369 375 376 377 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
82.8% Excellent
Read 346
Write 334
Mixed 336
SusWrite 350
77% 341 MB/s
4K Read 37.9
4K Write 38.2
4K Mixed 38
126% 38 MB/s
DQ Read 177
DQ Write 194
DQ Mixed 207
150% 193 MB/s
Poor: 47%
This bench: 82.8%
Great: 91%
Mass Storage Device 1TB
669GB free, PID 6116
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 33 41 41 42 42 42 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
64.6% Good
Read 40.8
Write 40.5
Mixed 40.2
SusWrite 40.1
55% 40.4 MB/s
4K Read 12.6
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 14.4
1,057% 14.1 MB/s
DQ Read 13.9
DQ Write 16.4
DQ Mixed 15.1
1,123% 15.1 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 64.6%
Great: 32%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair CM4X16GE2666C16K8 2x16GB
2 of 2 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2668 MHz
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
89% Excellent
MC Read 32.6
MC Write 34.1
MC Mixed 28
90% 31.6 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 37
SC Mixed 27.7
80% 27.8 GB/s
Latency 65.6
61% 65.6 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 89%
Great: 95%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 34.1" 1280 720 OST0000 TX ULTRAWIDE
Typical STRIX Z270I GAMING Builds (Compare 25 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 66%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 85%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 56%
Gunboat

System: PC STRIX Z270I GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 66% - Good Total price: $585
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback