Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU, SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (41%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

System	Hp-pavilion KQ256AA-AC4 m9360br (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK Benicia
Memory	1.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090910
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 24 '21 at 17:50
Run Duration	128 Seconds
Run User	BRA-User
Background CPU	41%

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100 59,658 User benchmarks, average bench 42% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	36.9% Below average	Memory 55.2 1-Core 26.8 2-Core 53.5 30% 45.2 Pts	4-Core 109 8-Core 108 14% 109 Pts	64-Core 103 6% 103 Pts
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 36.9% Great: 50%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 8400 331 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Asus(1043 0510) 256MB Ram: 256MB, Driver: 341.81 Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete		Lighting 0.3 Reflection 1.6 0% 0.95 fps
Poor: 0% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Intel Raid 0 Volume 1.5TB 1,782 User benchmarks, average bench 116% 1.5TB free (System drive) Firmware: 1.0. SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 181 118 81 93 151 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	102% Outstanding	Read 220 Write 199 Mixed 49.3 SusWrite 136 109% 151 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 1.1 232% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 47% ↑ This bench: 102% Great: 189%
ST316081 5AS 160GB 25 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 58GB free, PID 070c Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 23 22 22 22 24 MB/s Performing below expectations (23^rd percentile)	12% Very poor	Read 24 Write 15.3 Mixed 20.3 SusWrite 22.7 27% 20.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.7 64% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 12% Great: 18%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x1GB 54,972 User benchmarks, average bench 18% 4 of 4 slots used 4GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)	14.7% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 4.4 MC Mixed 4.2 14% 4.73 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 3.9 SC Mixed 3.8 12% 4.07 GB/s	Latency 142 28% 142 ns
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 14.7% Great: 28%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16