MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 65%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 84%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 51%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics85.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive92.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemMicro-Star MS-7C89
MotherboardMSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)  (all builds)
Memory8.8 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200820
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 23:59
Run Duration152 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU1%

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium Gold G6600
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
72.1% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 134
2-Core 212
82% 143 Pts
4-Core 347
8-Core 371
48% 359 Pts
64-Core 366
23% 366 Pts
Poor: 68%
This bench: 72.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 980-Ti-$560
Asus(1043 8549) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1602 MHz, MLim: 1902 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Lighting 106
Reflection 181
Parallax 111
86% 133 fps
MRender 109
Gravity 107
Splatting 97.1
85% 104 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 87%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Adata SU650NS38 120GB
64GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S190429a
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 105 56 62 53 64 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
92.5% Outstanding
Read 477
Write 394
Mixed 397
SusWrite 75.8
75% 336 MB/s
4K Read 41.4
4K Write 117
4K Mixed 48
186% 68.9 MB/s
DQ Read 229
DQ Write 298
DQ Mixed 238
187% 255 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 92.5%
Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 500GB-$23
442GB free
Firmware: HP73
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 123 122 123 122 123 MB/s
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
68.2% Good
Read 116
Write 99.5
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 122
73% 99.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.8
137% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 27%
This bench: 68.2%
Great: 88%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron Crucial CT8G4DFRA266.C8FE 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
71.7% Very good
MC Read 25.8
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 21.8
73% 25.4 GB/s
SC Read 16.6
SC Write 28.6
SC Mixed 19.8
62% 21.7 GB/s
Latency 73.9
54% 73.9 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 17: 1R 3G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
17% 11% 64 330 260 60 23.8" 1920 1080 ACR073C KA242Y
Typical H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89) Builds (Compare 3,338 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 42%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 39%
Jet ski

Motherboard: MSI H410M-A PRO (MS-7C89)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $281
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback