Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER

Performance Results


Gaming 59% Gunboat	Desktop 94% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 47% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (84th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 16 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	58% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	106% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (16%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER (all builds)
Memory	13.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit kleuren
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180418
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Jun 23 '21 at 21:39
Run Duration	208 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	16%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-4690K-$53 229,359 User benchmarks, average bench 70% SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	90.6% Outstanding	Memory 98.1 1-Core 120 2-Core 240 87% 153 Pts	4-Core 484 8-Core 461 64% 472 Pts	64-Core 485 30% 485 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 90.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 471.11 Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	58% Above average	Lighting 71.9 Reflection 76.9 Parallax 78.3 59% 75.7 fps	MRender 68 Gravity 71.8 Splatting 68.4 57% 69.4 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 58% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85 104,444 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 43GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXT0DB6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 281 140 142 142 124 108 MB/s Performing way above expectations (92^nd percentile)	106% Outstanding	Read 504 Write 491 Mixed 344 SusWrite 156 84% 374 MB/s	4K Read 44.5 4K Write 110 4K Mixed 54.4 196% 69.8 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 179 184% 301 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 108%
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB 35,237 User benchmarks, average bench 101% 10GB free Firmware: RVT24B6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 518 Write 491 Mixed 440 108% 483 MB/s	4K Read 49.3 4K Write 122 4K Mixed 67.4 226% 79.6 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 348 DQ Mixed 360 272% 364 MB/s
Poor: 74% Great: 126%
PNY CS900 120GB-$25 42,924 User benchmarks, average bench 69% 71GB free Firmware: CS900212 SusWrite @10s intervals: 230 235 235 239 239 297 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	85.4% Excellent	Read 451 Write 207 Mixed 353 SusWrite 246 70% 314 MB/s	4K Read 30.7 4K Write 94.9 4K Mixed 29.9 135% 51.8 MB/s	DQ Read 198 DQ Write 335 DQ Mixed 164 153% 232 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 87%
Seagate ST310005 28AS 1TB 6,973 User benchmarks, average bench 50% 682GB free Firmware: 0401 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 105 Write 102 Mixed 75.8 70% 94.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.9 161% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 18% Great: 69%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 11GB free Firmware: CR100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 68 67 68 68 68 69 MB/s Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	34.1% Below average	Read 50.7 Write 56.3 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 68 39% 53 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 129% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 34.1% Great: 44%
Samsung Spinpoint T166 500GB-$40 43,024 User benchmarks, average bench 34% 252GB free Firmware: CR100-12 SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 65 66 67 68 64 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	36.3% Below average	Read 60.2 Write 66.8 Mixed 43.8 SusWrite 66.1 44% 59.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.8 140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 36.3% Great: 44%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL TridentX DDR3 2400 C10 2x8GB 24,592 User benchmarks, average bench 67% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR3 2400 MHz clocked @ 2448 MHz Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	92.5% Outstanding	MC Read 33.5 MC Write 35 MC Mixed 30.5 94% 33 GB/s	SC Read 22.4 SC Write 23.2 SC Mixed 27.6 70% 24.4 GB/s	Latency 45.7 88% 45.7 ns
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 92.5% Great: 88%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	9	7	144	27"	1280 720	AOC2702 Q27G2G4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical MAXIMUS VII RANGER Builds (Compare 2,787 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 43%

Speed boat

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 36%

Jet ski

Motherboard: Asus MAXIMUS VII RANGER - $283

CPU
Core i7-4790KIntel $348Bench 79%, 455,746 samples	1,622x
Core i5-4690KIntel $53Bench 70%, 229,359 samples	447x
Core i7-4790Intel $135Bench 71%, 255,027 samples	223x

GPU
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	405x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	229x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	156x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	107x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	102x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	79x

RAM
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	109x
Vengeance Pro DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBCorsairBench 58%, 40,596 samples	106x
Savage DDR3 2400 C11 2x8GBHyperXBench 63%, 20,216 samples	91x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $925

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16