Lenovo 81W1

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (79th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 21 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 48%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics4.32% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81W1  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory7.3 GB free of 12 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210115
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 18:00
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User PRT-User
Background CPU8%

 PC Performing above expectations (79th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Athlon Silver 3050U Graphics
FP5, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
48% Average
Memory 63.2
1-Core 88.3
2-Core 194
63% 115 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 192
26% 192 Pts
64-Core 193
12% 193 Pts
Poor: 14%
This bench: 48%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon Graphics
Legend(17AA 3805) 2GB
Ram: 2GB, Driver: 21.6.1
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
4.32% Terrible
Lighting 3.9
Reflection 8.6
Parallax 5.3
3% 5.93 fps
MRender 7.7
Gravity 3.8
Splatting 11.2
6% 7.57 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.32%
Great: 7%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS3030 250GB SSD
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS303224
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 1,119
Write 936
Mixed 758
208% 937 MB/s
4K Read 3.8
4K Write 111
4K Mixed 36.6
112% 50.6 MB/s
DQ Read 375
DQ Write 254
DQ Mixed 294
225% 308 MB/s
Poor: 94% Great: 214%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown CT8G4SFRA266.C8FE Micron 4ATF51264HZ-2G6E! 12GB
2400, 2400 MHz
8192, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
82.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.5
MC Write 32
MC Mixed 26.9
86% 30.1 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 32.3
SC Mixed 22.3
72% 25 GB/s
Latency 119
34% 119 ns
Poor: 27%
This bench: 82.3%
Great: 76%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 15.5" 1280 720 AUO61ED
Typical 81W1 Builds (Compare 1,071 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 10%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 52%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 9%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81W1

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay more to market weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they return repeatedly.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback