Asrock X570 Steel Legend WiFi ax

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 97%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 90%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics79.9% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive269% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock X570 Steel Legend WiFi ax  (all builds)
Memory12.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201023
Uptime1.7 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 17:08
Run Duration274 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$420
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 4.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
90.3% Outstanding
Memory 78.4
1-Core 144
2-Core 288
94% 170 Pts
4-Core 547
8-Core 1,088
101% 817 Pts
64-Core 2,180
146% 2,180 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 90.3%
Great: 95%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$1,089
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 456.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (100 fps cap detected)
79.9% Very good
Lighting 98.4
Reflection 99.6
Parallax 99.6
80% 99.2 fps
MRender 99.5
Gravity 99.6
Splatting 99.5
80% 99.5 fps
Poor: 117%
This bench: 79.9%
Great: 149%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WDS500G3XHC-00SJG0 500GB
370GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 102000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1211 835 845 829 823 828 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
269% Outstanding
Read 2,028
Write 2069
Mixed 1,729
SusWrite 895
377% 1,680 MB/s
4K Read 49.5
4K Write 173
4K Mixed 74.5
262% 99.1 MB/s
DQ Read 1,295
DQ Write 1062
DQ Mixed 1,159
873% 1172 MB/s
Poor: 164%
This bench: 269%
Great: 281%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$70
883GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 101 103 104 104 105 103 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
61.9% Good
Read 112
Write 103
Mixed 81.2
SusWrite 103
74% 99.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.8
4K Mixed 0.9
185% 1.5 MB/s
Poor: 37%
This bench: 61.9%
Great: 78%
WD WD6003FZBX-00K5WB0 6TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete
Read 197
Write 199
Mixed 92.8
120% 163 MB/s
4K Read 1.3
4K Write 7.8
4K Mixed 1.9
410% 3.67 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 138%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$105
930GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 137 140 141 142 141 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
86.5% Excellent
Read 161
Write 126
Mixed 79.2
SusWrite 140
93% 127 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 0.9
193% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 86.5%
Great: 110%
WD Black 4TB (2012)-$213
1TB free
Firmware: 01.01L01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 121 121 122 124 123 123 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
70.9% Very good
Read 124
Write 121
Mixed 86.8
SusWrite 122
84% 114 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.7
4K Mixed 1
213% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 70.9%
Great: 93%
WD WD101FZBX-00ATAA0 10TB
5.5TB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 234 237 234 234 233 238 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 66% Great: 140%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB-$80
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
104% Outstanding
MC Read 43.8
MC Write 38.5
MC Mixed 34.2
111% 38.8 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 22.6
SC Mixed 33.1
77% 27.1 GB/s
Latency 83.7
48% 83.7 ns
Poor: 57%
This bench: 104%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

 SkillBench Score 45: 6R 3G 6B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware.

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
45% 31% 48 332 272 100 34.1" 3440 1440 ACI3433 ROG PG348Q
Typical X570 Steel Legend WiFi ax Builds (Compare 939 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asrock X570 Steel Legend WiFi ax

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $917
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-11600K $270Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-11400F $260Nvidia RTX 3060-Ti $400Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
Intel Core i7-11700K $380Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $183
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $79SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $80G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback