Lenovo 20HLS0E800

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 88%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics68.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive292% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemLenovo 20HLS0E800  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 20HLS0E800
Memory59.4 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200618
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 23 '21 at 07:46
Run Duration139 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 45%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E3-1535M v6
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 3.85 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
75.9% Very good
Memory 81.7
1-Core 120
2-Core 219
79% 140 Pts
4-Core 379
8-Core 551
58% 465 Pts
64-Core 612
38% 612 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 75.9%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P5000-M (Mobile)
Legend(17AA 2250) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1501 MHz, Ram: 16GB, Driver: 462.59
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
68.9% Good
Lighting 82.8
Reflection 110
Parallax 86.5
68% 93.2 fps
MRender 70.5
Gravity 85.7
Splatting 99.7
72% 85.3 fps
Poor: 43%
This bench: 68.9%
Great: 75%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM981 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB
883GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 5L2QEXA7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1328 1732 1671 1150 1148 1141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
292% Outstanding
Read 2,079
Write 1,974
Mixed 1,318
SusWrite 1,362
378% 1,683 MB/s
4K Read 57.3
4K Write 133
4K Mixed 77.4
256% 89.2 MB/s
DQ Read 1,161
DQ Write 898
DQ Mixed 1,039
775% 1,033 MB/s
Poor: 145%
This bench: 292%
Great: 329%
HitachiG ST 1TB
147GB free, PID 1014
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 86 86 89 87 89 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
33.1% Below average
Read 87
Write 63.9
Mixed 21.2
SusWrite 86.3
83% 64.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.3
29% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 8%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 41%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Ramaxel RMSA3300ME78HBF-2666 4x16GB
4 of 4 slots used
64GB SODIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (36th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
76.2% Very good
MC Read 28
MC Write 30.8
MC Mixed 25.8
81% 28.2 GB/s
SC Read 16.4
SC Write 22.1
SC Mixed 17.1
53% 18.5 GB/s
Latency 77.5
52% 77.5 ns
Poor: 46%
This bench: 76.2%
Great: 89%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 60 17.3" 1280 720 LEN4123
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback