Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 95%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 83%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 98.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics96.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive235% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (22%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING  (all builds)
Memory11.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200706
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 22 '21 at 20:20
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU 22%
Watch Gameplay: 3080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-9600KF-$180
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.45 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
98.4% Outstanding
Memory 93.9
1-Core 146
2-Core 292
97% 177 Pts
4-Core 554
8-Core 841
86% 697 Pts
64-Core 844
52% 844 Pts
Poor: 81%
This bench: 98.4%
Great: 102%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 3080-$910
Gigabyte(1458 403D) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2220 MHz, MLim: 4750 MHz, Ram: 10GB, Driver: 466.11
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (119 fps cap detected)
96.7% Outstanding
Lighting 118
Reflection 118
Parallax 118
97% 118 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 119
Splatting 118
97% 118 fps
Poor: 163%
This bench: 96.7%
Great: 202%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial P5 3D NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
621GB free (System drive)
Firmware: P4CR Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1302 1204 1409 1437 1410 1390 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
235% Outstanding
Read 1,734
Write 1,683
Mixed 1,153
SusWrite 1,359
333% 1,482 MB/s
4K Read 52.1
4K Write 36.8
4K Mixed 35.7
144% 41.5 MB/s
DQ Read 1,648
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 173
303% 642 MB/s
Poor: 175%
This bench: 235%
Great: 370%
Seagate ST3000DM003-1F216N 3TB
1TB free
Firmware: 0001
SusWrite @10s intervals: 106 106 107 109 107 105 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
64.3% Good
Read 117
Write 92.6
Mixed 65.1
SusWrite 107
70% 95.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.7
140% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 64.3%
Great: 99%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70
178GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 109 106 112 109 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
53.4% Above average
Read 77.6
Write 69.4
Mixed 56.9
SusWrite 108
57% 78.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 53.4%
Great: 67%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$60
741GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 116 118 117 121 117 115 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 99.8
Write 99.5
Mixed 66.8
SusWrite 117
70% 95.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.9
173% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 83%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Adata DDR4 3600 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
57.4% Above average
MC Read 21.2
MC Write 20.5
MC Mixed 16.3
55% 19.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.8
SC Write 21
SC Mixed 19.1
53% 18.6 GB/s
Latency 60.2
66% 60.2 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 57.4%
Great: 122%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 8 6 120 27" 1280 720 ACR052F XB271HU A
Typical TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING Builds (Compare 3,298 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 105%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PLUS GAMING

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $583
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $79G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback