MSI H61M-E33 (MS-7680)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 29%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics39.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemMSI MS-7680
MotherboardMSI H61M-E33 (MS-7680)  (all builds)
Memory5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110331
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 10:35
Run Duration497 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU4%
Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2500K-$246
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (79th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Memory 81.3
1-Core 92.6
2-Core 184
69% 119 Pts
4-Core 357
8-Core 356
48% 357 Pts
64-Core 358
22% 358 Pts
Poor: 44%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130
CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1900 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 21.5.2
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
39.6% Below average
Lighting 46.4
Reflection 62.8
Parallax 69.4
38% 59.5 fps
MRender 62.9
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 44.6
43% 53.7 fps
Poor: 37%
This bench: 39.6%
Great: 49%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 500GB (2010)-$35
397GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 03.01A03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 34 12 11 44 63 63 MB/s
Performing below expectations (38th percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 69.7
Write 62.2
Mixed 47.6
SusWrite 37.8
40% 54.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
107% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 50%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$39
819GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 164 163 164 163 164 MB/s
Performing above expectations (74th percentile)
95.2% Outstanding
Read 168
Write 156
Mixed 75.3
SusWrite 164
103% 141 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.1
227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 95.2%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F3-12800CL9-4GBZL F3-12800CL9-4GBZL 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
51.5% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.5
MC Mixed 16.5
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.4
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 78.2
51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 51.5%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 34: 5R 3G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
34% 24% 34 328 259 60 23.5" 1920 1080 SAM0D20 S24F350
History: Score 27: 3R 3G 3B | Score 24: 2R 3G 5B | Score 21: 2R 2G 5B | Score 43: 5R 4G 6B | Score 50: 7R 4G 3B | Score 27: 1R 4G 10B | Score 35: 3R 4G 8B | Score 34: 5R 3G 0B
Typical H61M-E33 (MS-7680) Builds (Compare 95 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 57%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: MSI H61M-E33 (MS-7680)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 41% - Average Total price: $400
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback