Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 38%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 75.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics51.2% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive57.2% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (13%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7  (all builds)
Memory8.2 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200703
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 09:07
Run Duration182 Seconds
Run User CZE-User
Background CPU 13%

 PC Performing below expectations (37th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 1700X-$195
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.8 GHz, turbo 3.75 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
75.1% Very good
Memory 67.2
1-Core 116
2-Core 230
75% 138 Pts
4-Core 446
8-Core 686
70% 566 Pts
64-Core 1,081
67% 1,081 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 75.1%
Great: 80%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$499
CLim: 1987 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
51.2% Above average
Lighting 22.8
Reflection 189
Parallax 175
19% 129 fps
MRender 128
Gravity 176
Splatting 121
114% 142 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 51.2%
Great: 133%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Amd-raid Array 1 2.5TB
2.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: 9.3
SusWrite @10s intervals: 388 415 351 398 436 463 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.2% Above average
Read 442
Write 448
Mixed 259
SusWrite 408
88% 389 MB/s
4K Read 8.9
4K Write 17.6
4K Mixed 9.2
35% 11.9 MB/s
DQ Read 109
DQ Write 71.8
DQ Mixed 83.4
64% 88 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 57.2%
Great: 102%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
3.5TB free
Firmware: 9401
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 29 29 30 30 30 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
20.4% Poor
Read 41.2
Write 31
Mixed 28.6
SusWrite 29.5
24% 32.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 20.4%
Great: 97%
SanDisk Cruzer Glide 16GB
10GB free, PID 5575
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 6.9 8.5 8.4 9 8.2 8.8 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
8.08% Terrible
Read 25.8
Write 4.5
Mixed 9.7
SusWrite 8.3
13% 12.1 MB/s
4K Read 4.2
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 2.9
131% 2.53 MB/s
Poor: 7%
This bench: 8.08%
Great: 17%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown F4-3600C16-8GVKC F4-3200C16-8GVK F4-3600C16-8GVKC F4-3200C16-8GVK 32GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
34.7% Below average
MC Read 13.3
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 11.9
34% 11.8 GB/s
SC Read 12.6
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 10.2
32% 11 GB/s
Latency 108
37% 108 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 110 6 60 24" 1920 1080 ACR0312 S241HL
Typical GA-AX370-Gaming K7 Builds (Compare 528 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 79%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 77%
Battleship

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming K7 - $229

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $817
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback