Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 160%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 107%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 161%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (76th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 24 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 105%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics152% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING  (all builds)
Memory26.1 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display5120 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200221
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 21 '21 at 03:54
Run Duration308 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2080-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (76th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9900KF-$279
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.9 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
105% Outstanding
Memory 95.3
1-Core 156
2-Core 308
102% 186 Pts
4-Core 618
8-Core 1,087
103% 852 Pts
64-Core 1,633
101% 1,633 Pts
Poor: 90%
This bench: 105%
Great: 104%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Zotac(19DA 2503) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (35th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
152% Outstanding
Lighting 205
Reflection 195
Parallax 223
167% 208 fps
MRender 258
Gravity 202
Splatting 155
162% 205 fps
Poor: 128%
This bench: 152%
Great: 174%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel Optane+477G 512GB
337GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 18.30
SusWrite @10s intervals: 635 239 143 106 56 33 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 35% Great: 94%
WDC WDS500G2B0A-00SM50 500GB
316GB free
Firmware: 401000WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 427 428 427 428 424 421 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
112% Outstanding
Read 500
Write 475
Mixed 380
SusWrite 426
100% 445 MB/s
4K Read 36.6
4K Write 85.6
4K Mixed 47.6
162% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 381
DQ Write 324
DQ Mixed 259
220% 322 MB/s
Poor: 68%
This bench: 112%
Great: 111%
Nvme Samsung SSD 970 EVO Plus 1TB
509GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2075 1640 1642 1642 1642 1605 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
332% Outstanding
Read 2,573
Write 2,377
Mixed 1,856
SusWrite 1,708
478% 2,128 MB/s
4K Read 63.6
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 79.9
261% 87 MB/s
DQ Read 1,074
DQ Write 862
DQ Mixed 971
726% 969 MB/s
Poor: 165%
This bench: 332%
Great: 421%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$106
1TB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 180 179 181 181 181 180 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (89th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 158
Mixed 28.2
SusWrite 180
99% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 104%
Great: 110%
WD Game Drive 5TB
3TB free, PID 262f
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 107 107 106 106 108 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
50% Average
Read 89.8
Write 67
Mixed 67.8
SusWrite 108
112% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 0.7
173% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 17%
This bench: 50%
Great: 66%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
PNY 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K Adata DDR4 3200 8GBF1X08QFHH36-135-K Adata DDR4 3200 32GB
3200, 3200, 3200, 3200 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
94.4% Outstanding
MC Read 35.9
MC Write 36.8
MC Mixed 26.5
94% 33.1 GB/s
SC Read 19.8
SC Write 43.5
SC Mixed 28.6
88% 30.6 GB/s
Latency 56.3
71% 56.3 ns
Poor: 81%
This bench: 94.4%
Great: 91%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 19: 2R 2G 3B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
19% 17% 42 296 218 120 48.8" 2560 720 SAM7053 LC49G95T
History: Score 33: 3R 5G 3B | Score 19: 2R 2G 3B
Typical ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING Builds (Compare 15,818 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 150%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 139%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING - $339

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 96% - Outstanding Total price: $1,257
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback