HP ZBook 15 G6

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics42.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive152% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory24GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 24GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemHP ZBook 15 G6  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 860F
Memory19.6 GB free of 24 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20210111
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 20 '21 at 21:23
Run Duration147 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i9-9880H
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 2.3 GHz, turbo 2.5 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
73.1% Very good
Memory 76.9
1-Core 114
2-Core 228
77% 139 Pts
4-Core 395
8-Core 433
54% 414 Pts
64-Core 860
53% 860 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.1%
Great: 90%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro RTX 3000
HP(103C 8611) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3000 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 462.59
Performing below potential (4th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
42.3% Average
Lighting 55.7
Reflection 51.9
Parallax 43.3
45% 50.3 fps
MRender 13.6
Gravity 53.7
Splatting 58.1
36% 41.8 fps
Poor: 45%
This bench: 42.3%
Great: 74%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba THNSN5512GPU7 NVMe PCIe M.2 512GB
359GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 57HA4105 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 674 438 573 747 802 860 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
152% Outstanding
Read 769
Write 722
Mixed 657
SusWrite 682
159% 708 MB/s
4K Read 22.4
4K Write 96.1
4K Mixed 48
146% 55.5 MB/s
DQ Read 919
DQ Write 595
DQ Mixed 743
558% 752 MB/s
Poor: 90%
This bench: 152%
Great: 235%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471A1K43CB1-CTD M471A1K43CB1-CTD M471A1K43DB1-CTD 24GB
2667, 2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192, 8192 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
61% Good
MC Read 22.6
MC Write 23
MC Mixed 18.3
61% 21.3 GB/s
SC Read 15.1
SC Write 24
SC Mixed 20.8
57% 20 GB/s
Latency 86.4
46% 86.4 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 1: 0R 0G 1B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
1% 1% 130 57 32 60 15.5" 1536 864 BOE07F3
Typical ZBook 15 G6 Builds (Compare 931 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 13%
Tree trunk

System: HP ZBook 15 G6

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback