Asus M4A87TD/USB3

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 16% Surfboard	Desktop 57% Gunboat	Workstation 11% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	32.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (31%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A87TD/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	12.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100824
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 20 '21 at 09:42
Run Duration	210 Seconds
Run User	FIN-User
Background CPU	31%

Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144 43,442 User benchmarks, average bench 53% AM3, 1 CPU, 3 cores, 3 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)	50.5% Above average	Memory 77.8 1-Core 47.2 2-Core 90.1 47% 71.7 Pts	4-Core 135 8-Core 146 19% 141 Pts	64-Core 149 9% 149 Pts
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 50.5% Great: 61%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59 946,701 User benchmarks, average bench 29% MSI(1462 3351) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 456.71 Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	32.7% Below average	Lighting 42.3 Reflection 41.6 Parallax 40.6 34% 41.5 fps	MRender 37.6 Gravity 43.4 Splatting 28.6 29% 36.5 fps
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 32.7% Great: 33%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Kingston A400 240GB-$28 424,288 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 108GB free (System drive) Firmware: S1Z40102 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 370 Write 221 Mixed 261 63% 284 MB/s	4K Read 27.8 4K Write 7.6 4K Mixed 0.6 47% 12 MB/s
Poor: 33% Great: 100%
Seagate Momentus 5400.6 2.5" 500GB-$22 83,084 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 458GB free Firmware: 0003SDM1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 73 73 74 75 75 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	38% Below average	Read 70.3 Write 16.8 Mixed 37.8 SusWrite 62.1 34% 46.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.7 121% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 38% Great: 43%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905403-198.A00LF 9905403-198.A00LF Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 Samsung M378B5273DH0-CH9 16GB 3 User benchmarks, average bench 33% 667, 667, 667, 667 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	33.2% Below average	MC Read 14.7 MC Write 7.5 MC Mixed 12.5 33% 11.6 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 9.3 22% 7.53 GB/s	Latency 84.8 47% 84.8 ns
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 33.2% Great: 33%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 8: 1R 1G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
8%	5%	41	94	5	60	23"	1920 1080	HWP3063 HP E231

History: Score 0: 0R 0G 0B | Score 8: 1R 1G 0B

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A87TD/USB3 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	41x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	24x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	22x

GPU
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	8x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	6x

SSD
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	7x
BX500 240GBCrucial $28Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	5x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $139Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x

RAM
99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5471-002.A01LF Team--Elite-133300 8GBKingstonBench 26%, 4 samples	3x
M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG KRE-D3U1600M/8G000 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 18GBNanyaBench 27%, 6 samples	3x
DDR3 2000G DDR3 2000G Kingston 9905403-431.A00LF Kingston 9905403-431.A00LF 12GBAdataBench 27%, 9 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16