Gigabyte GA-C246-WU4-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 46%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 100%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 47%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 97.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics41.3% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 2 years ago.
SystemGigabyte C246-WU4
MotherboardGigabyte GA-C246-WU4-CF  (all builds)
Memory7.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200916
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 19 '21 at 18:14
Run Duration271 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU3%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-3GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E-2278G
U3E1, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 4.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (59th percentile)
97.8% Outstanding
Memory 96.9
1-Core 153
2-Core 298
101% 182 Pts
4-Core 529
8-Core 1,019
92% 774 Pts
64-Core 1,539
95% 1,539 Pts
Poor: 82%
This bench: 97.8%
Great: 103%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 466.77
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
41.3% Average
Lighting 49.3
Reflection 51
Parallax 48.7
40% 49.7 fps
MRender 64.2
Gravity 51.5
Splatting 47
44% 54.2 fps
Poor: 48%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 EVO M.2 500GB
405GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT24B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 372 371 372 370 373 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 503
Write 376
Mixed 320
SusWrite 370
88% 392 MB/s
4K Read 32
4K Write 91.3
4K Mixed 40.9
149% 54.7 MB/s
DQ Read 377
DQ Write 318
DQ Mixed 266
222% 320 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 126%
Samsung 870 QVO 1TB-$100
2GB free
Firmware: SVQ02B6Q
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 504
Write 475
Mixed 436
105% 472 MB/s
4K Read 37.7
4K Write 91.9
4K Mixed 50.2
170% 59.9 MB/s
DQ Read 380
DQ Write 340
DQ Mixed 354
267% 358 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 128%
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$69
57GB free
Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 2,395
Write 2,238
Mixed 1,513
455% 2,049 MB/s
4K Read 62.2
4K Write 141
4K Mixed 81.2
273% 94.8 MB/s
DQ Read 1232
DQ Write 974
DQ Mixed 1,076
812% 1,094 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 346%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
HyperX Predator 2666 C13 2x8GB-$137
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
81.8% Excellent
MC Read 33.3
MC Write 29.4
MC Mixed 22.1
81% 28.3 GB/s
SC Read 19.4
SC Write 32.9
SC Mixed 24.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 50.7
79% 50.7 ns
Poor: 51%
This bench: 81.8%
Great: 99%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 39: 4R 4G 7B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
39% 23% 64 104 5 144 27" 2560 1440 HPN3678 HP X27i
History: Score 30: 3R 3G 6B | Score 36: 3R 4G 9B | Score 39: 4R 4G 7B
Typical GA-C246-WU4-CF Builds (Compare 88 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 180%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 178%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-C246-WU4-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 74% - Very good Total price: $1,195
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback