Google Peppy

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 22%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (66th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 34 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemGoogle Peppy  (all builds)
MotherboardGOOGLE Peppy
Memory0.9 GB free of 2 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170714
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJun 19 '21 at 12:02
Run Duration150 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU6%

 PC Performing above expectations (66th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 2955U
, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
44.4% Average
Memory 75.9
1-Core 40.3
2-Core 78.8
43% 65 Pts
4-Core 78.1
8-Core 80.5
11% 79.3 Pts
64-Core 77.8
5% 77.8 Pts
Poor: 20%
This bench: 44.4%
Great: 46%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)
Intel(8086 0A06) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.4624
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
1.57% Terrible
Lighting 1.8
Reflection 1.7
Parallax 3
2% 2.17 fps
MRender 3.3
Gravity 1
Splatting 2.2
2% 2.17 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.57%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingdian N400 120GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0522A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 84 72 129 67 86 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
41.8% Average
Read 426
Write 353
Mixed 316
SusWrite 121
68% 304 MB/s
4K Read 23.8
4K Write 23.8
4K Mixed 1
50% 16.2 MB/s
DQ Read 73.9
DQ Write 106
DQ Mixed 27.7
38% 69.3 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 41.8%
Great: 73%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Elpida EDJ4216EFBG-GN-F 1x2GB
1 of 1 slots used
2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
29.9% Poor
MC Read 10.5
MC Write 10.3
MC Mixed 9.3
29% 10 GB/s
SC Read 8.5
SC Write 7.5
SC Mixed 8.5
23% 8.17 GB/s
Latency 88.4
45% 88.4 ns
Poor: 20%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 31%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 11.6" 1280 720 CMN1132
Typical Peppy Builds (Compare 26 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 1%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 19%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 1%
Tree trunk

System: Google Peppy

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback