Toshiba Satellite P300

Performance Results


Gaming 4% Tree trunk	Desktop 41% Speed boat	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (30th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 70 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 41.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	1.41% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	58.6% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (50%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Toshiba Satellite P300 (all builds)
Motherboard	TOSHIBA Satellite P300
Memory	3.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1440 x 900 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20090407
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '21 at 11:52
Run Duration	166 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	50%

PC Performing below expectations (30^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T9900-$180 1,008 User benchmarks, average bench 41% U2E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.05 GHz, turbo 3 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Memory 69.2 1-Core 35 2-Core 74 39% 59.4 Pts	4-Core 86.6 8-Core 85.2 12% 85.9 Pts	64-Core 86 5% 86 Pts
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 45%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
ATI Mobility Radeon HD 4500 9,615 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Toshiba(1179 FF50) 512MB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 8.970.100.9001 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.41% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 3.8 Parallax 1.6 2% 2.4 fps	MRender 2 Gravity 0.8 Splatting 1.9 1% 1.57 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.41% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$76 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 364GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 173 211 226 225 214 220 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	58.6% Above average	Read 223 Write 238 Mixed 237 SusWrite 211 51% 227 MB/s	4K Read 27.7 4K Write 35.6 4K Mixed 27.1 96% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 169 DQ Write 156 DQ Mixed 163 122% 163 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 58.6% Great: 129%
Samsung 850 EVO mSATA 500GB 3,936 User benchmarks, average bench 100% 4GB free Firmware: EMT4 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable		Read 230 Write 235 Mixed 234 52% 233 MB/s	4K Read 29.1 4K Write 49.1 4K Mixed 35.7 116% 38 MB/s	DQ Read 166 DQ Write 151 DQ Mixed 158 118% 158 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 128%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x4GB 424,126 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB SODIMM Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	18.4% Very poor	MC Read 6.9 MC Write 5.3 MC Mixed 5.2 17% 5.8 GB/s	SC Read 4.5 SC Write 5.5 SC Mixed 5.3 15% 5.1 GB/s	Latency 103 39% 103 ns
Poor: 17% ↑ This bench: 18.4% Great: 65%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	8	6	60	17.1"	1280 720	LPLA101

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Satellite P300 Builds (Compare 36 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 37%

Jet ski

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Toshiba Satellite P300

CPU
Core2 Duo P8600Intel $42Bench 37%, 8,502 samples	5x
Core2 Duo T6400Intel $99Bench 34%, 4,995 samples	5x
Core2 Duo P8400Intel $20Bench 37%, 6,904 samples	4x

GPU
Mobility Radeon HD 3650ATIBench 2%, 3,003 samples	15x
Mobility Radeon HD 3400ATIBench 1%, 7,025 samples	11x
Mobility Radeon HD 4650ATIBench 3%, 4,405 samples	5x

SSD
Force 60GBCorsairBench 39%, 1,468 samples	3x
CS900 240GBPNY $25Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	2x
Fury 240GBHyperX $193Bench 71%, 27,826 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	21x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	10x
2x4GBUnknownBench 39%, 424,126 samples	2x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $42

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16