MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 77% Battleship


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	94.2% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Micro-Star MS-7B77
Motherboard	MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77) (all builds)
Memory	12.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.9 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20210421
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 19 '21 at 09:18
Run Duration	444 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	2%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 5 2600X-$189 142,983 User benchmarks, average bench 74% AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	84.5% Excellent	Memory 81.8 1-Core 122 2-Core 241 82% 148 Pts	4-Core 468 8-Core 703 73% 586 Pts	64-Core 900 56% 900 Pts
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 84.5% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% MSI(1462 C303) CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (66^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	94.2% Outstanding	Lighting 119 Reflection 129 Parallax 118 97% 122 fps	MRender 95.1 Gravity 119 Splatting 109 89% 108 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 367,854 User benchmarks, average bench 276% 45GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2QEXM7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,558 Write 2,192 Mixed 1,849 489% 2,200 MB/s	4K Read 61.8 4K Write 123 4K Mixed 80.6 262% 88.4 MB/s	DQ Read 976 DQ Write 624 DQ Mixed 864 627% 821 MB/s
Poor: 178% Great: 355%
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 138GB free Firmware: 2B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1207 393 294 294 294 294 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	195% Outstanding	Read 1,346 Write 1,207 Mixed 998 SusWrite 463 224% 1,004 MB/s	4K Read 54.6 4K Write 113 4K Mixed 70 232% 79.3 MB/s	DQ Read 971 DQ Write 840 DQ Mixed 920 686% 910 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 195% Great: 280%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Crucial BLE8G4D30AEEA.K16FE 2x8GB 1,650 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2933 MHz Performing way above expectations (94^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 41 MC Write 37.7 MC Mixed 36.2 109% 38.3 GB/s	SC Read 28.4 SC Write 39.1 SC Mixed 31.7 94% 33.1 GB/s	Latency 77.2 52% 77.2 ns
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 51: 6R 4G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
51%	35%	55	335	269	60	24"	1920 1080	GSM58BA M2482D

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77) Builds (Compare 312 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 95%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: MSI X470 GAMING M7 AC (MS-7B77)

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	174x
Ryzen 5 2600AMD $150Bench 73%, 179,588 samples	12x
Ryzen 7 5800XAMD $175Bench 98%, 128,080 samples	12x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	25x
RTX 2080Nvidia $389Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	23x
RTX 2070Nvidia $200Bench 104%, 478,117 samples	21x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	27x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $159Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	11x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $100Bench 235%, 154,949 samples	11x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 4x8GBCorsairBench 87%, 76,101 samples	10x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 78% - Very good

Total price: $851

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16