Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 27%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 72%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 23%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 67.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics35.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive96% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus SABERTOOTH 990FX  (all builds)
Memory6.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20121016
Uptime3.5 Days
Run DateJun 19 '21 at 08:36
Run Duration224 Seconds
Run User AUS-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD FX-8350-$130
Socket 942, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
67.7% Good
Memory 86.9
1-Core 60.3
2-Core 141
59% 96.2 Pts
4-Core 263
8-Core 418
42% 341 Pts
64-Core 419
26% 419 Pts
Poor: 48%
This bench: 67.7%
Great: 68%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1595 MHz, MLim: 1848 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing way above expectations (97th percentile)
35.9% Below average
Lighting 45.7
Reflection 49.9
Parallax 43.9
37% 46.5 fps
MRender 38.9
Gravity 44.5
Splatting 39.4
33% 40.9 fps
Poor: 30%
This bench: 35.9%
Great: 36%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 512GB-$182
178GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXM04B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 386 416 420 422 402 MB/s
Performing below expectations (35th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Read 492
Write 426
Mixed 182
SusWrite 367
82% 367 MB/s
4K Read 31.3
4K Write 71.8
4K Mixed 40.1
137% 47.7 MB/s
DQ Read 276
DQ Write 235
DQ Mixed 192
161% 234 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 96%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDS721010DLE630 1TB-$150
428GB free
Firmware: MS2OA600
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 106 102 110 110 109 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
67% Good
Read 126
Write 131
Mixed 29.9
SusWrite 107
71% 98.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.5
124% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 67%
Great: 99%
WD My Book 1230 6TB
779GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 133 136 136 135 130 MB/s
Performing as expected (57th percentile)
52.8% Above average
Read 120
Write 116
Mixed 83.5
SusWrite 130
152% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.9
109% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 52.8%
Great: 68%
WD Ext HDD 1021 2.5TB
1TB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 27 27 28 28 28 MB/s
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
16% Very poor
Read 28.7
Write 27.4
Mixed 24.4
SusWrite 26.7
36% 26.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.9
4K Mixed 0.7
91% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 16%
Great: 20%
WD Multimedia 0622 3TB
887GB free, PID 0622
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 28 28 29 29 28 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
15.7% Very poor
Read 29.9
Write 27.2
Mixed 23.3
SusWrite 27.6
36% 27 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
84% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 15.7%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 16GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (65th percentile)
41.9% Average
MC Read 15.8
MC Write 14.6
MC Mixed 13.5
42% 14.6 GB/s
SC Read 9.9
SC Write 8.4
SC Mixed 11.3
28% 9.87 GB/s
Latency 70.5
57% 70.5 ns
Poor: 25%
This bench: 41.9%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 23: 2R 3G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
23% 9% 97 104 6 60 7.2" 1366 768 GKK0200 MONITOR
Typical SABERTOOTH 990FX Builds (Compare 424 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus SABERTOOTH 990FX - $200

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $523
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback