ADD TO PC
BUILD

HP Compaq 6530b (GW688AV)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (67th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 33 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 38.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	31.6% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	HP Compaq 6530b (GW688AV) (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 30DD
Memory	2.9 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display	1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20111207
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '21 at 20:35
Run Duration	141 Seconds
Run User	BGD-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Duo T5870 2,085 User benchmarks, average bench 34% Intel(R) Genuine processor, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2 GHz Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	38.4% Below average	Memory 69.8 1-Core 23.5 2-Core 43.9 34% 45.7 Pts	4-Core 44.1 8-Core 45.2 6% 44.7 Pts	64-Core 45.2 3% 45.2 Pts
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 38.4% Great: 39%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Adata S396 60GB 21 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 3.3.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 50 50 49 50 48 50 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	31.6% Below average	Read 89.6 Write 55.2 Mixed 76.1 SusWrite 49.6 15% 67.6 MB/s	4K Read 18.5 4K Write 37.6 4K Mixed 18.8 72% 25 MB/s	DQ Read 74 DQ Write 59.2 DQ Mixed 65.5 49% 66.2 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 31.6% Great: 39%
Toshiba MK1655GSX 160GB-$40 2,046 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 128GB free Firmware: FG011C SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 57 57 57 58 58 MB/s Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	32.8% Below average	Read 56.8 Write 59.4 Mixed 29.9 SusWrite 57.2 37% 50.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 0.5 99% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 32.8% Great: 34%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x2GB 446,702 User benchmarks, average bench 20% 2 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (28^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	14.3% Very poor	MC Read 5.6 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.7 12% 4.27 GB/s	SC Read 3.6 SC Write 3.1 SC Mixed 4.3 10% 3.67 GB/s	Latency 102 39% 102 ns
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 14.3% Great: 44%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?

Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.

Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?

Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.

Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?

We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.

Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?

The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.

Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?

Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.

The Best

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $289	WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $145
Intel Core i5-12400F $110	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369

Today's hottest

Amazon Ebay

deals

CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD

If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission

Build

Test

EFps

Can You Run It?

►
YouTube
*NEW*

About • User Guide • FAQs • Email • Privacy • Developer • YouTube Feedback