Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T901

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 55%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (81st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 19 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.68% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemFujitsu LIFEBOOK T901  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU FJNB231
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120416
Uptime0.9 Days
Run DateJul 23 '17 at 18:16
Run Duration244 Seconds
Run User GRC-User
Background CPU 18%

 PC Performing above expectations (81st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
Onboard, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
58.1% Above average
Memory 86.3
1-Core 78.8
2-Core 144
63% 103 Pts
4-Core 184
8-Core 131
22% 158 Pts
64-Core 130
8% 130 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 58.1%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Fujitsu(10CF 15F5) 3.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2559
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.68% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 3.5
Parallax 0.81
2% 2.14 fps
MRender 3.05
Gravity 0.77
Splatting 2.13
2% 1.98 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.68%
Great: 2%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue 2.5" 250GB (2009)-$30
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0 Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
38.4% Below average
Read 65.2
Write 68.6
Mixed 65
50% 66.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.37
4K Write 1.56
4K Mixed 0.31
79% 0.75 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 38.4%
Great: 41%
O2micro SD 67GB
62GB free
Firmware: 0001
Performing above expectations (83rd percentile)
7.63% Terrible
Read 19.9
Write 4.86
Mixed 3.06
7% 9.28 MB/s
4K Read 5.65
4K Write 0.005
4K Mixed 0.004
236% 1.89 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 7.63%
Great: 8%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5273CH0-CK0 Kingston SNY1600S11-4G-EDEG 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
54.3% Above average
MC Read 20.2
MC Write 20.9
MC Mixed 18.3
57% 19.8 GB/s
SC Read 9.5
SC Write 10.6
SC Mixed 14.7
33% 11.6 GB/s
Latency 71
56% 71 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical LIFEBOOK T901 Builds (Compare 17 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu LIFEBOOK T901

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 85% - Excellent Total price: $34
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback