Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 69% Battle cruiser	Desktop 90% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 59% Gunboat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	71.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	37.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Gigabyte B365 M AORUS ELITE
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF (all builds)
Memory	11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20190813
Uptime	2.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 18 '21 at 02:34
Run Duration	156 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	7%

Watch Gameplay How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-9400F-$98 299,482 User benchmarks, average bench 85% U3E1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.9 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	90.5% Outstanding	Memory 90.8 1-Core 125 2-Core 244 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 495 8-Core 651 73% 573 Pts	64-Core 728 45% 728 Pts
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 90.5% Great: 91%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super)-$239 428,800 User benchmarks, average bench 71% Gigabyte(1458 4014) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2175 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (67^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	71.9% Very good	Lighting 91.7 Reflection 122 Parallax 80.6 75% 98.1 fps	MRender 106 Gravity 75.6 Splatting 68.8 66% 83.4 fps
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 71.9% Great: 76%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Patriot P200 256GB 1,581 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 122GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0424A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 289 8.2 126 20 9 69 MB/s Performing way below expectations (18^th percentile)	37.8% Below average	Read 502 Write 423 Mixed 18.8 SusWrite 86.6 57% 258 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 10.2 4K Mixed 0.7 37% 10.3 MB/s	DQ Read 109 DQ Write 11.4 DQ Mixed 0.7 16% 40.4 MB/s
Poor: 32% ↑ This bench: 37.8% Great: 93%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$31 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 678GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 148 147 150 151 151 149 MB/s Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	96.7% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 178 Mixed 97 SusWrite 149 112% 153 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.1 227% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 96.7% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Aegis DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB 37,374 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2666 MHz Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	85.4% Excellent	MC Read 34 MC Write 34.6 MC Mixed 24.6 89% 31.1 GB/s	SC Read 18.2 SC Write 27.4 SC Mixed 22.8 65% 22.8 GB/s	Latency 66.1 60% 66.1 ns
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 85.4% Great: 107%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score	Hit Rate	Shots	EFps	0.1% Low	Refresh Rate	Screen	Resolution	Monitor
0%	0%	0	12	10	144	23.8"	1280 720	AOC2402 24G2W1G4

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF Builds (Compare 2,209 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 79%

Battleship

Desktop 87%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 66%

Battle cruiser

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B365 M AORUS ELITE-CF

CPU
Core i5-9400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	731x
Core i7-9700Intel $250Bench 92%, 79,875 samples	166x
Core i5-9600KIntel $145Bench 93%, 321,194 samples	163x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	185x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $239Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	164x
GTX 1650Nvidia $155Bench 43%, 259,091 samples	125x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	50x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	50x
SA2000M8500G 500GBKingstonBench 197%, 87,883 samples	42x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	200x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	63x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $524

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $163	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $31	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $37	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16