Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 104%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 80%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (73rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 27 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 103%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics76.3% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive223% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory48GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 48GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
2 years ago, 2 years ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II  (all builds)
Memory42.4 GB free of 48 GB @ 3.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20190314
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 17 '21 at 21:31
Run Duration165 Seconds
Run User RUS-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1660 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$193
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
103% Outstanding
Memory 96.1
1-Core 149
2-Core 300
100% 182 Pts
4-Core 590
8-Core 999
97% 795 Pts
64-Core 1,236
76% 1,236 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 103%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1660-$200
Nvidia(10DE 2184) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2295 MHz, MLim: 2510 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 425.89
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
76.3% Very good
Lighting 98.2
Reflection 127
Parallax 77.8
80% 101 fps
MRender 85.4
Gravity 89.4
Splatting 79.5
69% 84.8 fps
Poor: 62%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 73%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Blue SN500 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$37
333GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 2010 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1005 748 743 746 572 484 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
223% Outstanding
Read 1,227
Write 1,164
Mixed 1061
SusWrite 716
234% 1,042 MB/s
4K Read 52.5
4K Write 205
4K Mixed 80.8
292% 113 MB/s
DQ Read 725
DQ Write 1,092
DQ Mixed 845
657% 887 MB/s
Poor: 133%
This bench: 223%
Great: 228%
OCZ Vertex 3 120GB-$42
30GB free
Firmware: 2.22
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 127 112 139 141 139 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
85.8% Excellent
Read 425
Write 150
Mixed 205
SusWrite 132
50% 228 MB/s
4K Read 37
4K Write 120
4K Mixed 43.4
176% 67 MB/s
DQ Read 189
DQ Write 140
DQ Mixed 152
117% 161 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 85.8%
Great: 82%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$27
79GB free
Firmware: CC43
SusWrite @10s intervals: 139 109 123 148 157 159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
86% Excellent
Read 161
Write 152
Mixed 73.5
SusWrite 139
96% 131 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.8
144% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 86%
Great: 112%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
158GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 115 117 117 119 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
85.3% Excellent
Read 180
Write 142
Mixed 87.5
SusWrite 117
97% 132 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
138% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 85.3%
Great: 114%
WD Black 500GB (2008)-$95
97GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 50 50 50 50 49 MB/s
Performing below expectations (24th percentile)
38.3% Below average
Read 82.5
Write 78.3
Mixed 62.3
SusWrite 50.2
51% 68.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
180% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 38.3%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2666 C13 3x16GB
3 of 4 slots used
48GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3600 MHz
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
108% Outstanding
MC Read 40.2
MC Write 41.8
MC Mixed 33.5
110% 38.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.9
SC Write 46.4
SC Mixed 32.2
94% 32.8 GB/s
Latency 53.7
74% 53.7 ns
Poor: 49%
This bench: 108%
Great: 107%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II Builds (Compare 640 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 102%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 94%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z370-PLUS GAMING II

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 98% - Outstanding Total price: $539
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $38Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback