Asus P8P67 LE

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 76%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 36%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics58.5% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive93.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8P67 LE  (all builds)
Memory10.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20130912
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 17 '21 at 20:24
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%
Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-2600K-$319
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
70.2% Very good
Memory 84.6
1-Core 84.1
2-Core 173
67% 114 Pts
4-Core 302
8-Core 469
48% 385 Pts
64-Core 468
29% 468 Pts
Poor: 56%
This bench: 70.2%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117
CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing way above expectations (91st percentile)
58.5% Above average
Lighting 73.3
Reflection 75.7
Parallax 68.9
60% 72.6 fps
MRender 65
Gravity 72.6
Splatting 67.9
56% 68.5 fps
Poor: 51%
This bench: 58.5%
Great: 60%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$94
323GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 247 420 305 264 265 269 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
93.2% Outstanding
Read 458
Write 446
Mixed 393
SusWrite 295
90% 398 MB/s
4K Read 31.4
4K Write 57.9
4K Mixed 40.1
130% 43.1 MB/s
DQ Read 384
DQ Write 348
DQ Mixed 365
274% 366 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 93.2%
Great: 134%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: HP33
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 157 157 159 159 159 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
94.3% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 151
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 155
102% 140 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
157% 1 MB/s
Poor: 51%
This bench: 94.3%
Great: 114%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$39
13GB free
Firmware: 05.00K05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 88 100 101 101 101 102 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
58.6% Above average
Read 105
Write 96
Mixed 79
SusWrite 98.7
70% 94.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.47 MB/s
Poor: 35%
This bench: 58.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 859B BLT4G3D1608ET3LX0. 029E CMZ8GX3M2A1600C9 16GB
1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
48.8% Average
MC Read 17
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.4
47% 16.5 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16.4
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 72.5
55% 72.5 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% 0% 0 9 7 60 27.9" 1280 720 AUS28B1 ASUS VP28U
Typical P8P67 LE Builds (Compare 1,247 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 36%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 28%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67 LE - $113

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 59% - Above average Total price: $635
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback