Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 131%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 87%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 135%
UFO
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 80.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics165% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive119% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS  (all builds)
Memory25.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20200615
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 17 '21 at 02:31
Run Duration254 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 11%
Watch Gameplay: 6800-XT + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 3700X-$190
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (20th percentile)
80.7% Excellent
Memory 66.9
1-Core 148
2-Core 295
89% 170 Pts
4-Core 505
8-Core 914
85% 710 Pts
64-Core 1,329
82% 1,329 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 80.7%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD RX 6800-XT-$650
AMD(1002 0E3A) ≥ 4GB
Ram: 16GB, Driver: 20.12.1
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
165% Outstanding
Lighting 209
Reflection 237
Parallax 422
170% 289 fps
MRender 345
Gravity 152
Splatting 255
204% 251 fps
Poor: 165%
This bench: 165%
Great: 178%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD Black NVMe PCIe M.2 256GB (2017)-$135
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: B35500WD Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 207 126 57 81 39 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
119% Outstanding
Read 979
Write 664
Mixed 551
SusWrite 130
129% 581 MB/s
4K Read 41.5
4K Write 78.6
4K Mixed 49.7
168% 56.6 MB/s
DQ Read 537
DQ Write 326
DQ Mixed 177
200% 346 MB/s
Poor: 86%
This bench: 119%
Great: 144%
WD Green 3TB (2011)-$59
311GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 77 76 77 78 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
57.7% Above average
Read 125
Write 75.5
Mixed 85.1
SusWrite 76.1
67% 90.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
176% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 57.7%
Great: 83%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
327GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 120 120 120 120 119 120 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
60.9% Good
Read 91.2
Write 151
Mixed 29.3
SusWrite 120
71% 97.7 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 2.1
380% 2.83 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 60.9%
Great: 110%
General UDisk 32GB
30GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5 5.1 5.5 5.5 5.2 5.3 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
4.78% Terrible
Read 11.5
Write 4
Mixed 3.7
SusWrite 5.3
7% 6.12 MB/s
4K Read 8.3
4K Write 0
4K Mixed 0
31% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.78%
Great: 10%
ST1000DX 001-1CM162 1TB
291GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.1 1.1 0.8 1 0.3 4 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
40.9% Average
Read 158
Write 97.3
Mixed 77.7
SusWrite 2.5
98% 83.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 5.6
4K Mixed 1.7
252% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 40.9%
Great: 72%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 4GB
4GB free, PID 1603
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.3 7.9 9.2 9.5 9.5 9.4 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
7.05% Terrible
Read 20.7
Write 9.7
Mixed 8.5
SusWrite 8.3
14% 11.8 MB/s
4K Read 8.2
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0
34% 2.77 MB/s
Poor: 2%
This bench: 7.05%
Great: 7%
WDC WD50 00AZRX-00A3KB0 500GB
346GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 80 82 78 82 81 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
43% Average
Read 119
Write 110
Mixed 65.6
SusWrite 80.7
123% 93.6 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
126% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43%
Great: 44%
WDC WD10 EZEX-00KUWA0 1TB
653GB free, PID 0567
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 81 82 79 82 82 MB/s
Performing as expected (47th percentile)
51.6% Above average
Read 169
Write 153
Mixed 99.1
SusWrite 81.6
162% 126 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
145% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 51.6%
Great: 72%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Patriot 3000 C16 Series 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
61.4% Good
MC Read 24.1
MC Write 17.3
MC Mixed 24.8
63% 22.1 GB/s
SC Read 18.3
SC Write 15.7
SC Mixed 22.1
53% 18.7 GB/s
Latency 109
37% 109 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 61.4%
Great: 124%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 53: 7R 3G 9B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
53% 41% 46 300 224 60 31.5" 1920 1080 GSM7700 LG 32 FHD
History:
Typical TUF GAMING B550-PLUS Builds (Compare 7,983 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 142%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF GAMING B550-PLUS

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 88% - Excellent Total price: $749
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $48
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $29Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback