Asrock H270M Performance

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 64%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 91%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 55%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (85th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 15 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 86.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics69.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive95% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsrock H270M Performance  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170418
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 17:41
Run Duration154 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
86.6% Excellent
Memory 90.8
1-Core 128
2-Core 256
88% 158 Pts
4-Core 445
8-Core 652
68% 548 Pts
64-Core 682
42% 682 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 86.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P4000
Nvidia(10DE 11A3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1708 MHz, MLim: 1901 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 462.59
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
69.6% Good
Lighting 81.3
Reflection 93.3
Parallax 87.4
66% 87.3 fps
MRender 90.7
Gravity 89.1
Splatting 96.7
76% 92.2 fps
Poor: 64%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 70%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Micron_5200_MTFDDAK960TDC 960GB
702GB free (System drive)
Firmware: D1MU004
SusWrite @10s intervals: 316 437 413 466 469 470 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
95% Outstanding
Read 312
Write 438
Mixed 302
SusWrite 428
84% 370 MB/s
4K Read 22
4K Write 118
4K Mixed 34.4
140% 58.1 MB/s
DQ Read 281
DQ Write 338
DQ Mixed 264
211% 294 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 95%
Great: 106%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB
818GB free
Firmware: 0.1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 170 182 179 182 183 183 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 216
Write 172
Mixed 111
SusWrite 180
124% 170 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 3.1
4K Mixed 1.7
330% 2.27 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 114%
Great: 110%
Seagate ST1000NX0313 1TB
823GB free
Firmware: SN02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 126 127 127 128 128 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
72.6% Very good
Read 125
Write 120
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 127
78% 106 MB/s
4K Read 2
4K Write 3.4
4K Mixed 1.1
268% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 72.6%
Great: 76%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown AQD-D4U4GN24-SG 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing as expected (58th percentile)
79.1% Very good
MC Read 29.9
MC Write 31
MC Mixed 22.1
79% 27.7 GB/s
SC Read 17.7
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 25.4
73% 25.6 GB/s
Latency 66
61% 66 ns
Poor: 72%
This bench: 79.1%
Great: 81%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 0: 0R 0G 0B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
0% -nan(ind)% 0 356 298 75 21.5" 1920 1080 AUS22A1 ASUS VP228
Typical H270M Performance Builds (Compare 96 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 44%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Asrock H270M Performance

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 100% - Outstanding Total price: $297
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback