Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 101%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 84%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 102%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics85.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive76.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO  (all builds)
Memory10.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180227
Uptime0.8 Days
Run DateJun 16 '21 at 14:56
Run Duration153 Seconds
Run User ROU-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700K-$188
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Memory 96
1-Core 154
2-Core 305
102% 185 Pts
4-Core 581
8-Core 954
94% 767 Pts
64-Core 1,165
72% 1,165 Pts
Poor: 76%
This bench: 102%
Great: 100%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77
Performing below potential (7th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
85.7% Excellent
Lighting 103
Reflection 122
Parallax 117
84% 114 fps
MRender 90.1
Gravity 123
Splatting 110
89% 108 fps
Poor: 86%
This bench: 85.7%
Great: 101%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 240GB-$89
106GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3J96R9
SusWrite @10s intervals: 245 172 113 75 76 44 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
76.8% Very good
Read 467
Write 426
Mixed 326
SusWrite 121
75% 335 MB/s
4K Read 30.1
4K Write 89.7
4K Mixed 33.8
136% 51.2 MB/s
DQ Read 292
DQ Write 120
DQ Mixed 166
133% 193 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 76.8%
Great: 88%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$62
302GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 72 76 88 64 116 153 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
30.9% Below average
Read 13.2
Write 72.5
Mixed 22.2
SusWrite 94.5
37% 50.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.3
61% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 30.9%
Great: 114%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$28
842GB free
Firmware: CC47
SusWrite @10s intervals: 194 194 194 194 194 195 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (94th percentile)
111% Outstanding
Read 194
Write 164
Mixed 75.7
SusWrite 194
114% 157 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.9
156% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 111%
Great: 112%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3333 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3000 MHz
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
MC Read 35.1
MC Write 36
MC Mixed 25.6
92% 32.2 GB/s
SC Read 20.9
SC Write 39.1
SC Mixed 28.2
84% 29.4 GB/s
Latency 54.1
74% 54.1 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 115%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

 SkillBench Score 26: 2R 4G 4B (High Scores)

Measures user input accuracy relative to the given hardware

Score Hit Rate Shots EFps 0.1% Low Refresh Rate Screen Resolution Monitor
26% 11% 88 196 12 75 21.7" 1920 1080 GSM5B34 MP59G
History:
Typical ROG MAXIMUS X HERO Builds (Compare 3,703 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 112%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 96%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 103%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus ROG MAXIMUS X HERO - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 78% - Very good Total price: $1,196
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback