Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics1.29% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
SystemSamsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511  (all builds)
MotherboardSAMSUNG RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511
Memory2.7 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20110107
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJul 23 '17 at 07:23
Run Duration171 Seconds
Run User CHL-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium P6200
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2.15 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
40.6% Average
Memory 64.8
1-Core 52.2
2-Core 102
45% 73.1 Pts
4-Core 97.7
8-Core 97.4
13% 97.6 Pts
64-Core 72
4% 72 Pts
Poor: 24%
This bench: 40.6%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 315M
Sanyo(144D C581) 512MB
Ram: 512MB, Driver: 342.1
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.29% Terrible
Lighting 1.4
Reflection 2.85
Parallax 0.53
1% 1.59 fps
MRender 3.48
Gravity 0.3
Splatting 2.09
2% 1.95 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.29%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB-$71
443GB free (System drive)
Firmware: PB4OC66G Max speed: SATA 2.0 300 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
34.6% Below average
Read 58.8
Write 61.7
Mixed 11.4
32% 44 MB/s
4K Read 0.48
4K Write 1.23
4K Mixed 0.32
79% 0.68 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 34.6%
Great: 45%
Lenovo USB Hard Drive 1TB
482GB free, PID 4533
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
9.24% Terrible
Read 25.3
Write 19.2
Mixed 9.32
21% 17.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.49
4K Write 0.41
4K Mixed 0.16
21% 0.35 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.24%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M471B5773CHS-CH9 80CE M471B5773CHS-CF8 4GB
1334, 1066 MHz
2048, 2048 MB
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
23.4% Poor
MC Read 7.6
MC Write 7.1
MC Mixed 9.1
23% 7.93 GB/s
SC Read 6.6
SC Write 5.2
SC Mixed 6.6
18% 6.13 GB/s
Latency 114
35% 114 ns
Poor: 16%
This bench: 23.4%
Great: 24%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 41%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk

System: Samsung RV411/RV511/E3511/S3511

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products, which UserBenchmark reveals.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback