Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (63rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 37 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics25.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive91.9% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-S2H  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 960 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150908
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateJul 23 '17 at 06:07
Run Duration156 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$79
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 77.2
1-Core 82.5
2-Core 192
66% 117 Pts
4-Core 344
8-Core 362
47% 353 Pts
64-Core 372
23% 372 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760-$209
EVGA(3842 3763) 2GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 384.76
Performing below potential (40th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
25.5% Poor
Lighting 29.1
Reflection 27.2
Parallax 35.4
24% 30.5 fps
MRender 39.6
Gravity 35.4
Splatting 32.3
29% 35.8 fps
Poor: 24%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 28%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshib DT01ACA100 1TB
223GB free
Firmware: MS2O Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 6% Great: 19%
Plexto PX-256M6V 256GB
75GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.02 Max speed: SATA 3.0 600 MB/s
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
91.9% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 347
Mixed 360
90% 405 MB/s
4K Read 32.2
4K Write 90.1
4K Mixed 30.9
136% 51.1 MB/s
DQ Read 268
DQ Write 158
DQ Mixed 33.8
73% 153 MB/s
Poor: 79%
This bench: 91.9%
Great: 108%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown TEAMGROUP-UD4-2133 1x8GB
1 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing above expectations (71st percentile)
38% Below average
MC Read 13.5
MC Write 14.3
MC Mixed 12
38% 13.3 GB/s
SC Read 9
SC Write 10.3
SC Mixed 9.5
27% 9.6 GB/s
Latency 85.8
47% 85.8 ns
Poor: 24%
This bench: 38%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-S2H-CF Builds (Compare 4,373 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-S2H - $198

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 107% - Outstanding Total price: $394
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback