Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 95% Nuclear submarine	Desktop 88% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 93% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 89.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	105% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) (all builds)
Memory	7 GB free of 16 GB @ 3.4 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200617
Uptime	3.6 Days
Run Date	Jun 16 '21 at 03:11
Run Duration	138 Seconds
Run User	IND-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (62^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210 159,077 User benchmarks, average bench 76% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	89.6% Excellent	Memory 88.9 1-Core 124 2-Core 247 86% 153 Pts	4-Core 485 8-Core 843 80% 664 Pts	64-Core 1,352 84% 1,352 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 89.6% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$195 1,082,454 User benchmarks, average bench 102% Asus(1043 85AA) CLim: 1974 MHz, MLim: 2502 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (75^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	105% Outstanding	Lighting 132 Reflection 141 Parallax 135 108% 136 fps	MRender 118 Gravity 139 Splatting 120 103% 126 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 105% Great: 110%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$100 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 31GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 2,502 Write 1,166 Mixed 1,020 342% 1,563 MB/s	4K Read 61.3 4K Write 156 4K Mixed 81.9 280% 99.7 MB/s	DQ Read 976 DQ Write 806 DQ Mixed 902 673% 895 MB/s
Poor: 160% Great: 280%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 564GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 134 153 153 155 155 154 MB/s Performing as expected (57^th percentile)	96.8% Outstanding	Read 187 Write 142 Mixed 84.5 SusWrite 151 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.7 137% 1 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 96.8% Great: 114%
Seagate ST2000DM005-2CW102 2TB 18,723 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 89GB free Firmware: 0001 SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 87 79 87 90 90 MB/s Performing way below expectations (17^th percentile)	51.3% Above average	Read 93.2 Write 136 Mixed 70.2 SusWrite 85.5 71% 96.1 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0 68% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 51.3% Great: 88%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G Skill Intl F4-3600C17-8GTZR 2x8GB 326 User benchmarks, average bench 99% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3400 MHz Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	106% Outstanding	MC Read 44.5 MC Write 37.9 MC Mixed 32.5 109% 38.3 GB/s	SC Read 26.7 SC Write 43.1 SC Mixed 29 94% 32.9 GB/s	Latency 68.6 58% 68.6 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 106% Great: 126%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 922 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 98%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 96%

Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO (WI-FI) - $250

CPU
Ryzen 7 2700XAMD $210Bench 76%, 159,077 samples	361x
Ryzen 7 3700XAMD $205Bench 86%, 635,419 samples	90x
Ryzen 9 3900XAMD $395Bench 88%, 197,342 samples	67x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
RTX 3080Nvidia $909Bench 187%, 424,051 samples	52x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	44x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	54x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	51x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $81Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	49x

RAM
Skill Intl F4-3200C16-8GTZR 4x8GBGBench 94%, 9,782 samples	28x
Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $55Bench 85%, 346,786 samples	25x
Skill Intl F4-3200C14-8GFX 4x8GBGBench 109%, 918 samples	22x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $988

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16