Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results


Gaming 89% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 90% Nuclear submarine


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 78.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	72.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

3 years ago, 3 years ago, 3 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus PRIME X370-PRO (all builds)
Memory	10.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20170919
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '21 at 14:41
Run Duration	180 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	7%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1800X-$60 30,050 User benchmarks, average bench 72% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3.85 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (84^th percentile)	78.6% Very good	Memory 71.8 1-Core 115 2-Core 231 76% 139 Pts	4-Core 458 8-Core 838 78% 648 Pts	64-Core 1,242 77% 1,242 Pts
Poor: 58% ↑ This bench: 78.6% Great: 82%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Nvidia(10DE 1B06) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.77 Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	112% Outstanding	Lighting 154 Reflection 168 Parallax 154 125% 158 fps	MRender 108 Gravity 135 Splatting 104 94% 116 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 112% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D SATA M.2 250GB-$55 9,409 User benchmarks, average bench 85% 88GB free (System drive) Firmware: X61130WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 241 197 190 173 195 176 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	72.1% Very good	Read 486 Write 424 Mixed 334 SusWrite 195 80% 360 MB/s	4K Read 33.5 4K Write 24.7 4K Mixed 31 104% 29.7 MB/s	DQ Read 305 DQ Write 79.6 DQ Mixed 132 113% 172 MB/s
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 72.1% Great: 104%
SanDisk SSD 128GB-$84 8,513 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 69GB free Firmware: 2.0.0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 235 251 280 249 275 255 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	48.3% Average	Read 436 Write 216 Mixed 129 SusWrite 257 58% 260 MB/s	4K Read 19 4K Write 12.8 4K Mixed 9.6 48% 13.8 MB/s	DQ Read 33.1 DQ Write 12.5 DQ Mixed 14.2 13% 19.9 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 48.3% Great: 56%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 120GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 306 280 289 264 291 267 MB/s Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	80.6% Excellent	Read 494 Write 419 Mixed 401 SusWrite 283 90% 399 MB/s	4K Read 39.4 4K Write 19.5 4K Mixed 31.3 110% 30.1 MB/s	DQ Read 376 DQ Write 57.5 DQ Mixed 126 115% 186 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 80.6% Great: 124%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51 462,780 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 956GB free Firmware: CC26 SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 169 177 160 171 162 MB/s Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	101% Outstanding	Read 188 Write 179 Mixed 75.4 SusWrite 164 110% 152 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 145% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 63% ↑ This bench: 101% Great: 114%
Samsung Spinpoint F1 750GB-$60 30,974 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 1.5TB free Firmware: 1AA01109 SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 82 79 75 79 76 MB/s Performing above expectations (72^nd percentile)	47.9% Average	Read 88.2 Write 87.3 Mixed 53.2 SusWrite 78 56% 76.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 219% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 47.9% Great: 60%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CM4X8GF2133C13K4 2x8GB 2,981 User benchmarks, average bench 68% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing below potential (82^nd percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	72.7% Very good	MC Read 27 MC Write 25.9 MC Mixed 25.6 75% 26.2 GB/s	SC Read 19.2 SC Write 25.7 SC Mixed 22.1 64% 22.3 GB/s	Latency 97.3 41% 97.3 ns
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 72.7% Great: 80%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical PRIME X370-PRO Builds (Compare 2,537 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 74%

Battleship

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 72%

Battleship

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	420x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $211Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	326x
Ryzen 5 1600AMD $110Bench 70%, 392,253 samples	204x

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $195Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	217x
GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples	194x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	189x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	94x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	89x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GBSamsung $45Bench 199%, 240,629 samples	75x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	161x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $45Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	123x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $30Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	57x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 88% - Excellent

Total price: $644

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $254	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $175	Nvidia RTX 4070 $550	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Asus PRIME X370-PRO

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X370-PRO - $109

Feedback

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)