Asrock H470M Pro4

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 86% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 39% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (31st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 69 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	46.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	27.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

High background CPU (27%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

Motherboard	Asrock H470M Pro4 (all builds)
Memory	10.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20200421
Uptime	1.2 Days
Run Date	Jun 15 '21 at 03:05
Run Duration	117 Seconds
Run User	ARG-User
Background CPU	27%

Watch Gameplay: 580 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-10400F-$98 153,026 User benchmarks, average bench 85% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 2.9 GHz, turbo 3.95 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	88.2% Excellent	Memory 85.5 1-Core 126 2-Core 255 86% 155 Pts	4-Core 488 8-Core 790 78% 639 Pts	64-Core 974 60% 974 Pts
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 88.2% Great: 92%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 580-$130 360,351 User benchmarks, average bench 52% ASRock(1849 5030) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1370 MHz, MLim: 2000 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 21.4.1 Performing below potential (11^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	46.4% Average	Lighting 57.9 Reflection 58.6 Parallax 86.9 47% 67.8 fps	MRender 60.5 Gravity 63.5 Splatting 44.7 45% 56.2 fps
Poor: 46% ↑ This bench: 46.4% Great: 56%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Adata SU630 240GB 60,212 User benchmarks, average bench 64% 87GB free (System drive) Firmware: R1210A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 48 110 32 1.3 3.8 35 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	27.1% Poor	Read 430 Write 271 Mixed 10 SusWrite 38.3 41% 187 MB/s	4K Read 16.5 4K Write 5.4 4K Mixed 0.4 28% 7.43 MB/s
Poor: 28% ↑ This bench: 27.1% Great: 101%
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016)-$37 1,120,098 User benchmarks, average bench 92% 239GB free Firmware: CC43 SusWrite @10s intervals: 138 138 141 140 141 140 MB/s Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)	89.4% Excellent	Read 172 Write 174 Mixed 79.5 SusWrite 140 103% 141 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.6 132% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 60% ↑ This bench: 89.4% Great: 113%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown DDR4 3000 1x16GB 641 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 1 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing below potential (23^rd percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	41.1% Average	MC Read 14.6 MC Write 15 MC Mixed 11.4 39% 13.7 GB/s	SC Read 11 SC Write 14.1 SC Mixed 13.6 37% 12.9 GB/s	Latency 71.6 56% 71.6 ns
Poor: 36% ↑ This bench: 41.1% Great: 53%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H470M Pro4 Builds (Compare 315 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 104%

UFO

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Asrock H470M Pro4

CPU
Core i3-10100Intel $92Bench 80%, 24,563 samples	75x
Core i5-10400Intel $124Bench 84%, 71,804 samples	60x
Core i5-10400FIntel $98Bench 85%, 153,026 samples	50x

GPU
RTX 3060-TiNvidia $340Bench 128%, 442,467 samples	22x
GTX 1650S (Super)Nvidia $300Bench 59%, 180,577 samples	21x
RTX 3060Nvidia $266Bench 100%, 447,556 samples	18x

SSD
SM128E 121GBAppleBench 61%, 294 samples	12x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $76Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	10x
SSD 2TBPcieBench 350%, 13,829 samples	7x

RAM
Aegis DDR4 3000 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $36Bench 82%, 163,634 samples	14x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $35Bench 84%, 287,720 samples	10x
DDR4 2400 2OZ 1x8GBUnknownBench 40%, 8,909 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 101% - Outstanding

Total price: $468

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174	Nvidia RTX 4060 $293	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260	Nvidia RTX 4070 $549	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16