Biostar H67MH

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 70%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics8.05% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive33.8% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
MotherboardBiostar H67MH  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120511
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 14 '21 at 06:54
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User IDN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (50th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (96th percentile)
74.5% Very good
Memory 87.8
1-Core 94.9
2-Core 189
72% 124 Pts
4-Core 353
8-Core 366
48% 360 Pts
64-Core 370
23% 370 Pts
Poor: 50%
This bench: 74.5%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 650-$112
Asus(1043 8439) 1GB
CLim: 1071 MHz, MLim: 1250 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 466.27
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
8.05% Terrible
Lighting 8.7
Reflection 11.3
Parallax 12.1
7% 10.7 fps
MRender 13.9
Gravity 12.1
Splatting 10.9
10% 12.3 fps
Poor: 8%
This bench: 8.05%
Great: 9%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk PLUS 240GB
136GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF2204RL
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 56 74 46 54 70 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
33.8% Below average
Read 334
Write 298
Mixed 125
SusWrite 87.7
47% 211 MB/s
4K Read 15.5
4K Write 15.3
4K Mixed 12.3
47% 14.4 MB/s
DQ Read 18
DQ Write 9.4
DQ Mixed 11.5
9% 13 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 33.8%
Great: 56%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 250GB-$33
24GB free
Firmware: CC38
SusWrite @10s intervals: 99 106 104 104 105 106 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
37.1% Below average
Read 25
Write 10.7
Mixed 17.9
SusWrite 104
29% 39.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.9
4K Mixed 0.8
126% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 19%
This bench: 37.1%
Great: 68%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5471-034.A00LF 9905471-006.A00LF 8GB
1333, 1333 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
52.4% Above average
MC Read 18.6
MC Write 18.9
MC Mixed 16.4
51% 18 GB/s
SC Read 15.7
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.9 GB/s
Latency 69.8
57% 69.8 ns
Poor: 29%
This bench: 52.4%
Great: 53%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical H67MH Builds (Compare 32 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 34%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Biostar H67MH

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 58% - Above average Total price: $200
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark challenges their narrative so they attack our reputation with a co-ordinated charade.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of profit on flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, UserBenchmark's data exposes the youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ reviews on trustpilot are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't incentivized to back brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing sponsorship with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing real-world data which collectively saves our users millions.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback