Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 37.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Boot Drive	37.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 Extreme X7900 28 User benchmarks, average bench 37% Socket 478, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 1.95 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	37.6% Below average	Memory 67.7 1-Core 21.9 2-Core 34.9 32% 41.5 Pts	4-Core 46.9 8-Core 46.2 6% 46.6 Pts	64-Core 47.1 3% 47.1 Pts
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 37.6% Great: 42%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
3 120GB SSD 120GB 3,381 User benchmarks, average bench 60% 92GB free (System drive) Firmware: VA001C76 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 157 150 164 146 160 MB/s Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	37.1% Below average	Read 209 Write 204 Mixed 186 SusWrite 153 42% 188 MB/s	4K Read 13.8 4K Write 26 4K Mixed 9.8 47% 16.5 MB/s	DQ Read 120 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 134 97% 126 MB/s
Poor: 33% ↑ This bench: 37.1% Great: 91%
Kingston DataTraveler 3.0 124GB 9,173 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 64GB free, PID 1666 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.9 3.1 12 13 2.7 17 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	7.45% Terrible	Read 25.6 Write 5.3 Mixed 9.1 SusWrite 8.7 14% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 2.6 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.4 37% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.45% Great: 39%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR2 Performing as expected (55^th percentile)	13% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 3.5 MC Mixed 3.5 11% 3.8 GB/s	SC Read 3.9 SC Write 3.4 SC Mixed 3.2 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 107 37% 107 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 13% Great: 20%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 0%

Incomplete

Desktop 0%

Incomplete

Workstation 0%

Incomplete

CPU
Pentium Dual T2330Intel $90Bench 29%, 867 samples	1x

GPU
Intel 965 Express Chipset FamilyMobileBench 0%, 3,066 samples	1x

RAM
2x1GBUnknownBench 14%, 68,489 samples	1x

Value: 40% - Below average

Total price: $90

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16