Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS3

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (62nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 38 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 50%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21.6% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen.
Run History
MotherboardGigabyte GA-EP35-DS3  (all builds)
Memory6.1 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit kleuren
OSWindows 8.1
BIOS Date20080104
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 13 '21 at 21:54
Run Duration131 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU0%

 PC Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core2 Quad Q9450-$110
Socket 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.65 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
50% Average
Memory 74.1
1-Core 38.4
2-Core 76.6
42% 63 Pts
4-Core 152
8-Core 152
20% 152 Pts
64-Core 152
9% 152 Pts
Poor: 36%
This bench: 50%
Great: 57%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 570-$350
EVGA(3842 1573) 1.2GB
CLim: 797 MHz, MLim: 975 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
21.6% Poor
Lighting 25.2
Reflection 40.8
Parallax 30
20% 32 fps
MRender 39.1
Gravity 22.4
Splatting 26.8
24% 29.4 fps
Poor: 18%
This bench: 21.6%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 870 Evo 250GB-$45
183GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 220 222 227 228 228 227 MB/s
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.8% Good
Read 240
Write 226
Mixed 215
SusWrite 225
51% 226 MB/s
4K Read 32.9
4K Write 50.9
4K Mixed 39.2
127% 41 MB/s
DQ Read 42.3
DQ Write 75.4
DQ Mixed 54.1
42% 57.3 MB/s
Poor: 67%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 128%
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
247GB free
Firmware: 01.03B01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 115 117 117 117 116 115 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.2% Very good
Read 132
Write 124
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 116
82% 112 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 71.2%
Great: 69%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
21.5% Poor
MC Read 7.1
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.5
19% 6.77 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.5
SC Mixed 6.3
18% 6.3 GB/s
Latency 92.2
43% 92.2 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 45%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-EP35-DS3 Builds (Compare 83 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 54%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-EP35-DS3

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Very good Total price: $176
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback