Lenovo 81F8

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 5%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 33%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (53rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 47 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics2.79% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive149% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 81F8  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190612
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateJun 13 '21 at 06:13
Run Duration136 Seconds
Run User COL-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (53rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD A9-9425 APU (2016 M.SR)
Socket FS1r2, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.1 GHz, turbo 1.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
25.7% Poor
Memory 41.9
1-Core 42.1
2-Core 57.5
30% 47.2 Pts
4-Core 56.5
8-Core 56.6
8% 56.5 Pts
64-Core 63.9
4% 63.9 Pts
Poor: 9%
This bench: 25.7%
Great: 39%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
AMD Radeon R5 Graphics
Legend(17AA 380F) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 18.40.16
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
2.79% Terrible
Lighting 3.1
Reflection 4.6
Parallax 4.7
2% 4.13 fps
MRender 2.8
Gravity 3.1
Splatting 5.5
3% 3.8 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 2.79%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
193GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 669 703 512 342 299 271 MB/s
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
149% Outstanding
Read 1,324
Write 998
Mixed 933
SusWrite 466
208% 930 MB/s
4K Read 47.8
4K Write 76.9
4K Mixed 56.6
186% 60.4 MB/s
DQ Read 242
DQ Write 203
DQ Mixed 213
162% 219 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 149%
Great: 236%
Seagate ST1000LM 035-1RK172 1TB
923GB free
Firmware: LCM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 130 131 124 124 128 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
68.3% Good
Read 111
Write 114
Mixed 78.4
SusWrite 127
79% 108 MB/s
4K Read 1.9
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.3
144% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16%
This bench: 68.3%
Great: 70%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 99U5704-001.A00G Samsung M471A5244CB0-CTD 8GB
1866, 1866 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing below potential (33rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
22.7% Poor
MC Read 8.3
MC Write 7.8
MC Mixed 7.6
23% 7.9 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 7.2
SC Mixed 7.5
20% 6.93 GB/s
Latency 194
21% 194 ns
Poor: 19%
This bench: 22.7%
Great: 71%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 81F8 Builds (Compare 18 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 32%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 81F8

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing charade so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit a lot from flagships like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they've no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to market inferior products. UserBenchmark's data challenges the marketing and exposes the youtubers' biases.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. The 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of chasing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we've dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data which saves our users millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $176Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback