Asus PRIME X570-P

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (57th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 43 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle intensive workstation, and even full-fledged server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive294% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus PRIME X570-P  (all builds)
Memory23.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201104
Uptime1 Days
Run DateJun 13 '21 at 02:04
Run Duration203 Seconds
Run User BHS-User
Background CPU7%

 PC Performing as expected (57th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 9 3900X-$395
AM4, 1 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 4 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
91.3% Outstanding
Memory 78.1
1-Core 142
2-Core 284
90% 168 Pts
4-Core 559
8-Core 1,066
97% 813 Pts
64-Core 2,117
131% 2,117 Pts
Poor: 80%
This bench: 91.3%
Great: 97%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sabrent Rocket 4 NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$100
761GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RKT401.2 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2264 959 942 962 957 956 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
294% Outstanding
Read 2,033
Write 3,563
Mixed 2,198
SusWrite 1,173
508% 2,242 MB/s
4K Read 55.6
4K Write 177
4K Mixed 81.8
282% 105 MB/s
DQ Read 1,328
DQ Write 1,090
DQ Mixed 1,213
908% 1,211 MB/s
Poor: 189%
This bench: 294%
Great: 486%
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$129
63GB free
Firmware: EXM01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 451 451 451 451 451 451 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
107% Outstanding
Read 506
Write 447
Mixed 359
SusWrite 451
99% 441 MB/s
4K Read 35.4
4K Write 90.8
4K Mixed 47.2
162% 57.8 MB/s
DQ Read 219
DQ Write 185
DQ Mixed 200
150% 202 MB/s
Poor: 71%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Hitachi HDN726060ALE614 6TB
784GB free
Firmware: APGNW7JH
SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 125 133 129 133 125 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
71.7% Very good
Read 119
Write 121
Mixed 67.3
SusWrite 129
80% 109 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.4
180% 2.17 MB/s
Poor: 62%
This bench: 71.7%
Great: 121%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz
Performing way above expectations (86th percentile)
109% Outstanding
MC Read 43.9
MC Write 38.6
MC Mixed 39.6
116% 40.7 GB/s
SC Read 25.5
SC Write 23.9
SC Mixed 35.6
81% 28.3 GB/s
Latency 84.1
48% 84.1 ns
Poor: 67%
This bench: 109%
Great: 119%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical PRIME X570-P Builds (Compare 8,030 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 129%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 130%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus PRIME X570-P

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 87% - Excellent Total price: $833
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate countless reddit accounts. UserBenchmark’s data exposes their marketing spiel so they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands profit greatly from flagship hardware like the 4090, 14900KS, and 7950X3D. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Moreover, brands pay youtubers extra to promote inferior products but UserBenchmark’s data exposes them.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated online reviews. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated 13 years to publishing accurate real-world data. As a result, our users save millions every year and they keep returning.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $122Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback