Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 18% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 36.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.53% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	26.5% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (76%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

3 years ago, 3 years ago.

PC Performing as expected (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron 2955U 542 User benchmarks, average bench 37% , 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz, turbo 1.4 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	36.4% Below average	Memory 63.6 1-Core 36.5 2-Core 45.1 35% 48.4 Pts	4-Core 55.4 8-Core 63.5 8% 59.5 Pts	64-Core 72.2 4% 72.2 Pts
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 36.4% Great: 46%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz) 43,454 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Intel(8086 0A06) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5166 Performing above expectations (75^th percentile)	1.53% Terrible	Lighting 1.8 Reflection 1.5 Parallax 3 2% 2.1 fps	MRender 3 Gravity 1 Splatting 2.1 2% 2.03 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.53% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Transcend TS120GMTS420S 120GB 931 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 26GB free (System drive) Firmware: S0509A0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 47 63 64 65 70 MB/s Performing below potential (0^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	26.5% Poor	Read 270 Write 11.7 Mixed 212 SusWrite 60.9 30% 139 MB/s	4K Read 2.9 4K Write 16.9 4K Mixed 8.9 25% 9.57 MB/s	DQ Read 123 DQ Write 55.5 DQ Mixed 30.4 38% 69.7 MB/s
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 26.5% Great: 87%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Elpida EDJ4216EFBG-GN-F 1x2GB 11 User benchmarks, average bench 27% 1 of 1 slots used 2GB SODIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz Performing below potential (36^th percentile) - ensure that an XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	25.3% Poor	MC Read 10 MC Write 9.6 MC Mixed 7.6 26% 9.07 GB/s	SC Read 5.9 SC Write 5.1 SC Mixed 3.8 14% 4.93 GB/s	Latency 118 34% 118 ns
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 25.3% Great: 31%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 1%

Tree trunk

Desktop 19%

Surfboard

Workstation 1%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron 2957UIntelBench 38%, 2,764 samples	19x
Celeron 2955UIntelBench 37%, 542 samples	7x

GPU
HD Graphics (G4 Pentium/Celeron 1.05/1.15 GHz)IntelBench 2%, 43,454 samples	26x

SSD
128GB 128GBDogfishBench 60%, 387 samples	4x
128GB 128GBKingchuxingBench 69%, 246 samples	3x
NT-128 128GBBench 60%, 1,116 samples	2x

RAM
HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 1x2GBHynixBench 18%, 3,854 samples	11x
HMT425S6AFR6A-PB 2x2GBHynixBench 34%, 1,493 samples	9x
EDJ4216EFBG-GN-F 2x2GBElpidaBench 36%, 20 samples	5x