Gigabyte GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 44.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive156% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemGigabyte B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI
MotherboardGigabyte GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF  (all builds)
Memory12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20191127
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '21 at 22:13
Run Duration155 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU3%

 PC Performing below expectations (21st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600AF-$120
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 1.2 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
44.8% Average
Memory 70.1
1-Core 41.7
2-Core 80.7
42% 64.2 Pts
4-Core 116
8-Core 115
15% 116 Pts
64-Core 129
8% 129 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 44.8%
Great: 82%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SA2000M8250G 250GB
83GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S5Z42105
SusWrite @10s intervals: 421 274 272 266 271 216 MB/s
Performing as expected (40th percentile)
156% Outstanding
Read 1,443
Write 1,137
Mixed 1,021
SusWrite 287
216% 972 MB/s
4K Read 53.9
4K Write 89.9
4K Mixed 64.7
212% 69.5 MB/s
DQ Read 393
DQ Write 260
DQ Mixed 324
242% 326 MB/s
Poor: 103%
This bench: 156%
Great: 236%
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
380GB free
Firmware: 4010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 404 389 402 365 335 MB/s
Performing as expected (41st percentile)
73% Very good
Read 361
Write 443
Mixed 249
SusWrite 378
81% 358 MB/s
4K Read 21.2
4K Write 46.7
4K Mixed 24
88% 30.6 MB/s
DQ Read 103
DQ Write 282
DQ Mixed 129
117% 171 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73%
Great: 99%
WDC WDS500G2B0A 500GB
378GB free
Firmware: 4150
SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 219 218 220 217 220 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (16th percentile)
62.4% Good
Read 328
Write 441
Mixed 225
SusWrite 232
69% 307 MB/s
4K Read 20.8
4K Write 46.1
4K Mixed 23.9
86% 30.3 MB/s
DQ Read 104
DQ Write 276
DQ Mixed 132
117% 171 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 62.4%
Great: 99%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
60.5% Good
MC Read 21.1
MC Write 19.6
MC Mixed 21.3
59% 20.7 GB/s
SC Read 19.2
SC Write 27.5
SC Mixed 22.3
66% 23 GB/s
Latency 101
40% 101 ns
Poor: 66%
This bench: 60.5%
Great: 109%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF Builds (Compare 2,587 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 109%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 102%
UFO

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-B450 I AORUS PRO WIFI-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 99% - Outstanding Total price: $549
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback