Dell Inspiron 560

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 24%
Surfboard
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (26th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 74 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 26.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.55% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (38%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemDell Inspiron 560  (all builds)
MotherboardDell 018D1Y
Memory1.4 GB free of 4 GB @ 0.8 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100702
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 12 '21 at 21:36
Run Duration166 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 38%

 PC Performing below expectations (26th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium E5700-$22
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
26.4% Poor
Memory 40.8
1-Core 36.4
2-Core 46.9
27% 41.4 Pts
4-Core 72.8
8-Core 62.2
9% 67.5 Pts
64-Core 69.9
4% 69.9 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 26.4%
Great: 43%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel G45/G43 Express Chipset
Dell(1028 0439) 1.8GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2302
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
0.55% Terrible
Lighting 0.6
Reflection 0.8
Parallax 0.8
0% 0.73 fps
MRender 0.6
Gravity 1
Splatting 0.8
1% 0.8 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.55%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
MD2000GSA3272DVR 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware: JKAO
SusWrite @10s intervals: 66 94 95 81 81 22 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
52% Above average
Read 108
Write 81.4
Mixed 59
SusWrite 73.3
59% 80.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.9
149% 0.93 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 52%
Great: 86%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA641 2TB
131GB free, PID 0578
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 72 75 66 67 32 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
28.1% Poor
Read 70.5
Write 16.8
Mixed 53.8
SusWrite 60.6
64% 50.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.5
4K Mixed 0.4
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 28.1%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown KTW149-ELD 4x1GB
4 of 4 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR3 800 MHz
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
12.1% Very poor
MC Read 5
MC Write 3.8
MC Mixed 3.7
12% 4.17 GB/s
SC Read 3
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 2.4
7% 2.5 GB/s
Latency 199
20% 199 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 12.1%
Great: 32%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Inspiron 560 Builds (Compare 234 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 38%
Jet ski
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk

System: Dell Inspiron 560

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 43% - Average Total price: $84
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback