Lenovo 4236A78

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 56%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (61st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 39 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.77% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive55.7% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory6GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 6GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
SystemLenovo 4236A78  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO 4236A78
Memory3.9 GB free of 6 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110729
Uptime0 Days
Run DateJun 12 '21 at 15:14
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing above expectations (61st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-2520M-$34
CPU, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.5 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (88th percentile)
56.6% Above average
Memory 80.2
1-Core 82.2
2-Core 141
61% 101 Pts
4-Core 193
8-Core 196
26% 195 Pts
64-Core 199
12% 199 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 56.6%
Great: 59%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD 3000 (Mobile V2 1.3 GHz)
Legend(17AA 21CE) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4459
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
1.77% Terrible
Lighting 2.1
Reflection 2
Parallax 1.6
2% 1.9 fps
MRender 2.6
Gravity 1.3
Splatting 2.8
2% 2.23 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.77%
Great: 2%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
3 480GB SSD 480GB
245GB free (System drive)
Firmware: S1011A0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 384 23 14 203 14 159 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
55.7% Above average
Read 427
Write 349
Mixed 316
SusWrite 133
68% 306 MB/s
4K Read 14
4K Write 54
4K Mixed 15.2
69% 27.7 MB/s
DQ Read 111
DQ Write 329
DQ Mixed 25
75% 155 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 55.7%
Great: 101%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M471B5773CHS-CH9 6GB
1333, 1333 MHz
2048, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
39% Below average
MC Read 13.9
MC Write 14
MC Mixed 11.3
37% 13.1 GB/s
SC Read 11.4
SC Write 13.2
SC Mixed 12.1
35% 12.2 GB/s
Latency 80.2
50% 80.2 ns
Poor: 11%
This bench: 39%
Great: 48%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4236A78 Builds (Compare 4 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 3%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 47%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 3%
Tree trunk

System: Lenovo 4236A78

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 55% - Above average Total price: $62
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. Because UserBenchmark’s data often contradicts their marketing spiel, they systematically attack our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of money on flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers get comparable real-world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to praise us. Additionally, brands spend more on marketing weaker products which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community. It's obvious that the 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users aren't interested in promoting billon-dollar brands...
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of pursuing lucrative sponsorships with billion-dollar PC brands, we have dedicated the last 13 years to providing comprehensive and accurate data to our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again and collectively save millions every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $170Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback