Lenovo 80TA

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 42%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 42.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics2.89% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
CPU throttled at 99% by Windows. Ensure maximum processor state is set to 100% via Settings > System > Power & sleep > Additional power settings > Change plan settings > Change advanced power settings > Processor power management > Maximum processor state.
Run History
SystemLenovo 80TA  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LNVNB161216
Memory4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20171018
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 12 '21 at 14:40
Run Duration129 Seconds
Run User ESP-User
Background CPU8%
CPU Throttled 99%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Celeron 3865U
U3E1, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.8 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
42.9% Average
Memory 68.1
1-Core 55.2
2-Core 84.7
45% 69.3 Pts
4-Core 105
8-Core 112
14% 108 Pts
64-Core 111
7% 111 Pts
Poor: 27%
This bench: 42.9%
Great: 49%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 610
Legend(17AA 2112) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4528
Performing above expectations (81st percentile)
2.89% Terrible
Lighting 2.9
Reflection 3.6
Parallax 3.1
2% 3.2 fps
MRender 5.7
Gravity 2.7
Splatting 5.7
4% 4.7 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 2.89%
Great: 3%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
WD WD5000LPLX-00ZNTT0 500GB
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 77 89 88 90 85 88 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
54.7% Above average
Read 104
Write 107
Mixed 64.1
SusWrite 86.3
66% 90.4 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.8
155% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 32%
This bench: 54.7%
Great: 82%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown R6N-UH 0710 Tigo-2400MHz-4G 8GB
2133, 2133 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
57.6% Above average
MC Read 17.8
MC Write 25.4
MC Mixed 19.8
60% 21 GB/s
SC Read 11.1
SC Write 20.5
SC Mixed 15.5
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 106
38% 106 ns

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 80TA Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete

System: Lenovo 80TA

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $150
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback