Dell Precision Tower 7910

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 84%
Aircraft carrier
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 91%
Nuclear submarine
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (64th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 36 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 76.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics109% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive97.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemDell Precision Tower 7910
MotherboardDell Precision Tower 7910  (all builds)
Memory58.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display2560 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20201019
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateJun 12 '21 at 09:16
Run Duration146 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU0%
Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (64th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
1st CPU: Intel Xeon E5-2643 v3
SOCKET 1, 2 CPU, 12 cores, 24 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.15 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (52nd percentile)
76.3% Very good
Memory 71.9
1-Core 108
2-Core 216
73% 132 Pts
4-Core 433
8-Core 702
70% 568 Pts
64-Core 1,694
105% 1,694 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 76.3%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
Nvidia(10DE 1F07) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2190 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 456.71
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
109% Outstanding
Lighting 135
Reflection 118
Parallax 135
110% 129 fps
MRender 182
Gravity 135
Splatting 110
113% 143 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 109%
Great: 112%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 250GB
121GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 438 439 301 288 287 293 MB/s
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
97.4% Outstanding
Read 459
Write 433
Mixed 416
SusWrite 341
93% 412 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 73.2
4K Mixed 42.7
145% 50 MB/s
DQ Read 339
DQ Write 252
DQ Mixed 287
217% 293 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 97.4%
Great: 116%
Crucial M4 256GB-$218
16GB free
Firmware: 000F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 164 113 52 19 32 38 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
55.8% Above average
Read 450
Write 251
Mixed 258
SusWrite 69.6
57% 257 MB/s
4K Read 20
4K Write 69
4K Mixed 13.9
85% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 183
DQ Write 218
DQ Mixed 23.4
67% 142 MB/s
Poor: 43%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 74%
WD WD10EAVS-00D7B1 1TB
148GB free
Firmware: 1A01
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 66.6
Write 68.5
Mixed 44.2
44% 59.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.7
130% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 26% Great: 51%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Samsung M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A1G43DB0-CPB M393A2G40DB0-CPB 64GB
2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 16384, 8192, 8192, 8192, 16384 MB
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
66.3% Good
MC Read 28.9
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 23.3
70% 24.6 GB/s
SC Read 11.2
SC Write 19.6
SC Mixed 17.9
46% 16.2 GB/s
Latency 97.1
41% 97.1 ns
Poor: 37%
This bench: 66.3%
Great: 68%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical Precision Tower 7910 Builds (Compare 1,183 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 31%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 77%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 41%
Speed boat

Motherboard: Dell Precision Tower 7910

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $164Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $149
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $89
Intel Core i5-13600K $245Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $359
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback