Intel S2600CW

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (24th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 76 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 55.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics22% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive11.5% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardIntel S2600CW  (all builds)
Memory6.5 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20150601
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateJun 11 '21 at 17:16
Run Duration183 Seconds
Run User HKG-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (24th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
CPU1, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
55.8% Above average
Memory 76.4
1-Core 50.6
2-Core 102
48% 76.4 Pts
4-Core 192
8-Core 300
30% 246 Pts
64-Core 501
31% 501 Pts
Poor: 55%
This bench: 55.8%
Great: 75%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro K4200-$820
Nvidia(10DE 1096) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 888 MHz, MLim: 1350 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.75
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
22% Poor
Lighting 24.6
Reflection 28.1
Parallax 36.7
20% 29.8 fps
MRender 39.3
Gravity 30.1
Splatting 27.6
26% 32.3 fps
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22%
Great: 22%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Plextor M6S 256GB-$166
44GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.08
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 16 15 15 16 16 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
11.5% Very poor
Read 148
Write 139
Mixed 108
SusWrite 18.8
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 4.4
4K Write 4.3
4K Mixed 4.2
14% 4.3 MB/s
Poor: 64%
This bench: 11.5%
Great: 104%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
7.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 29 15 15 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 82
Write 67
Mixed 22.5
SusWrite 17.8
34% 47.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.5
106% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 96%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
3TB free
Firmware: 01.01K03
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 15 15 15 13 13 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile)
5.85% Terrible
Read 6
Write 13.5
Mixed 8
SusWrite 14.4
8% 10.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.1
4K Mixed 0.1
17% 0.1 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 5.85%
Great: 96%
WD Re 4TB (2012)-$70
1.5TB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
32% Below average
Read 95.8
Write 62.8
Mixed 25
SusWrite 15.5
36% 49.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 0.7
4K Mixed 0.1
62% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 32%
Great: 96%
WD My Passport 260D 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 260d
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 15 15 15 16 15 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (1st percentile)
7.75% Terrible
Read 23.8
Write 15.3
Mixed 14
SusWrite 15.4
22% 17.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.2
17% 0.2 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 7.75%
Great: 64%
Seagate Expansion 1TB
237GB free, PID 2312
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 15 16 15 16 16 16 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
7.01% Terrible
Read 14.3
Write 13.5
Mixed 14.7
SusWrite 15.5
20% 14.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.1
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.7
41% 0.43 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 7.01%
Great: 43%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston 9965589-007.D01G 4x8GB
4 of 16 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1866 MHz
Performing below potential (71st percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
73.4% Very good
MC Read 24.6
MC Write 39.5
MC Mixed 24.3
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 4.8
SC Write 11.7
SC Mixed 6.7
22% 7.73 GB/s
Latency 87.5
46% 87.5 ns
Poor: 56%
This bench: 73.4%
Great: 103%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical S2600CW Builds (Compare 10 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 92%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 75%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 133%
UFO

Motherboard: Intel S2600CW

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $160Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback