Casper NEO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Tree trunk	Desktop 23% Surfboard	Workstation 0% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 35.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	0.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	3GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 3GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (86%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

2 years ago, 2 years ago, 2 years ago.

System	Casper NEO (all builds)
Motherboard	MICRO-STAR CN-7529
Memory	1.9 GB free of 3 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1680 x 1050 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20080708
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Jun 11 '21 at 16:25
Run Duration	172 Seconds
Run User	TUR-User
Background CPU	86%

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Pentium 4 3.40GHz 1,108 User benchmarks, average bench 31% CPU 1, 1 CPU, 1 cores, 2 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	35.3% Below average	Memory 64.5 1-Core 23.9 2-Core 35.7 31% 41.4 Pts	4-Core 38.5 8-Core 39.3 5% 38.9 Pts	64-Core 38.5 2% 38.5 Pts
Poor: 14% ↑ This bench: 35.3% Great: 38%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 6500 122 User benchmarks, average bench 0% XFX(1682 2153) 64MB Driver: nvd3dum.dll Ver. 8.15.11.8593 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	0.05% Terrible	Lighting 0.1 Reflection 0.1 Parallax 0.1 0% 0.1 fps
Poor: 0% ↑ This bench: 0.05% Great: 0%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA050 500GB-$25 163,843 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 438GB free (System drive) Firmware: MS1OA750 SusWrite @10s intervals: 58 27 65 75 72 64 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	27% Poor	Read 33.9 Write 76.8 Mixed 25.3 SusWrite 60.3 36% 49.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.1 4K Write 0.4 4K Mixed 0.3 45% 0.27 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 27% Great: 103%
WD WD5000AVDS-63U7B1 500GB 24,608 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 149GB free Firmware: 01.00A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 59 45 61 59 49 44 MB/s Performing as expected (46^th percentile)	37.5% Below average	Read 77.9 Write 72.7 Mixed 30.9 SusWrite 52.9 43% 58.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.7 109% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 20% ↑ This bench: 37.5% Great: 52%
Mass Storage Device 400GB 19 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 373GB free, PID 6116 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 22 21 20 18 MB/s Performing below expectations (31^st percentile)	12.6% Very poor	Read 29 Write 26.6 Mixed 21.7 SusWrite 19.6 32% 24.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.4 59% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 12.6% Great: 19%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 3GB 81,553 User benchmarks, average bench 14% null MHz 2048, 1024 MB Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	13.9% Very poor	MC Read 5.1 MC Write 3.6 MC Mixed 4.1 12% 4.27 GB/s	SC Read 4 SC Write 2.7 SC Mixed 3.8 10% 3.5 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 13.9% Great: 23%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical NEO Builds (Compare 24 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 41%

Speed boat

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

System: Casper NEO

CPU
Core2 Quad Q8400Intel $150Bench 45%, 18,432 samples	8x
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples	2x
Pentium E5200Intel $50Bench 36%, 13,848 samples	2x

GPU
Radeon HD 4300ATIBench 1%, 14,988 samples	3x
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples	3x
GeForce 9400 GTNvidiaBench 1%, 12,718 samples	3x

SSD
SD250 120GN 120GBAfoxBench 60%, 16 samples	2x
860 Evo 250GBSamsung $52Bench 104%, 296,814 samples	2x
SSD 120GBBench 68%, 22,748 samples	1x

RAM
2x2GBUnknownBench 20%, 446,702 samples	12x
3GBUnknownBench 14%, 81,553 samples	6x
1x2GBUnknownBench 17%, 99,586 samples	5x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 53% - Above average

Total price: $150

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $209	Nvidia RTX 4060 $280	Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $128	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $129	Nvidia RTX 4070 $515	Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $29

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $39	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $32	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16