Lenovo 4263Y3A

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 6%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 58%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 5%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (70th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 30 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics7.56% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (12%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
2 years ago, 20 months ago.
SystemLenovo 4263Y3A  (all builds)
MotherboardLENOVO LENOVO
Memory3.6 GB free of 12 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit kolorów
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20110408
Uptime0.2 Days
Run DateJun 11 '21 at 03:03
Run Duration132 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 12%

 PC Performing above expectations (70th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Xeon E5640
1366-pin LGA, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.65 GHz, turbo 2.8 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
64.7% Good
Memory 89.3
1-Core 66.9
2-Core 127
59% 94.5 Pts
4-Core 219
8-Core 331
34% 275 Pts
64-Core 332
21% 332 Pts
Poor: 51%
This bench: 64.7%
Great: 77%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia Quadro 4000
Nvidia(10DE 0780) 2GB
CLim: 475 MHz, MLim: 702 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 377.83
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
7.56% Terrible
Lighting 8.3
Reflection 16.8
Parallax 10.8
7% 12 fps
MRender 16.3
Gravity 7.1
Splatting 10.6
9% 11.3 fps
Poor: 7%
This bench: 7.56%
Great: 7%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung PM830 128GB
20GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CXM05H1Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 25 25 24 22 24 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - RAM cached drive detected
Poor: 48% Great: 73%
Hitachi HTS545016B9A300 160GB-$30
126GB free
Firmware: PBBOC60F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 42 43 43 43 43 43 MB/s
Performing above expectations (68th percentile)
27.5% Poor
Read 52.7
Write 51.7
Mixed 31.1
SusWrite 42.9
33% 44.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
117% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 6%
This bench: 27.5%
Great: 34%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown M391B5273CH0-YH9 3x4GB
3 of 12 slots used
12GB DIMM DDR3 1066 MHz
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
43.4% Average
MC Read 15.7
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 17.2
43% 15 GB/s
SC Read 10.5
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 11
31% 10.8 GB/s
Latency 68.1
59% 68.1 ns
Poor: 33%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 52%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 4263Y3A Builds (Compare 1 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 24%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

System: Lenovo 4263Y3A

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 37% - Below average Total price: $229
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. We expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads of money on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data exposes youtubers that promote overpriced/inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $174Nvidia RTX 4060 $293Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $44
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $28Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback