Asus N56JR

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 69%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 11%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics10.9% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Boot Drive95.8% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
3 years ago, 3 years ago.
SystemAsus N56JR  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK N56JR
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit väriä,
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190611
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateJun 10 '21 at 20:57
Run Duration110 Seconds
Run User FIN-User
Background CPU10%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4700HQ-$370
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
68.6% Good
Memory 80.5
1-Core 91.8
2-Core 182
68% 118 Pts
4-Core 307
8-Core 467
48% 387 Pts
64-Core 466
29% 466 Pts
Poor: 40%
This bench: 68.6%
Great: 74%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 760M
Asus(1043 14AD) 2GB
Driver: nvldumdx.dll Ver. 25.21.14.2531
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
10.9% Very poor
Lighting 12.8
Reflection 13.1
Parallax 16.7
10% 14.2 fps
MRender 15.2
Gravity 16.7
Splatting 12.3
12% 14.7 fps
Poor: 9%
This bench: 10.9%
Great: 12%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$85
92GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 404 438 417 414 445 443 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (17th percentile)
95.8% Outstanding
Read 468
Write 448
Mixed 376
SusWrite 427
97% 430 MB/s
4K Read 30
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 38.2
123% 40.8 MB/s
DQ Read 298
DQ Write 263
DQ Mixed 287
213% 283 MB/s
Poor: 80%
This bench: 95.8%
Great: 134%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston ACR16D3LS1NGG/4G Samsung M471B5173BH0-YK0 8GB
1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (61st percentile)
52.2% Above average
MC Read 19.4
MC Write 20
MC Mixed 15.7
52% 18.4 GB/s
SC Read 12.3
SC Write 16.6
SC Mixed 15.3
42% 14.7 GB/s
Latency 79.7
50% 79.7 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 52.2%
Great: 54%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical N56JR Builds (Compare 84 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 8%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 59%
Gunboat
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

System: Asus N56JR

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 52% - Above average Total price: $455
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketers operate thousands of reddit accounts. Our benchmarks expose their spiel so they attack our reputation.
Why don’t PC brands endorse UserBenchmark?
Brands make boatloads on flagships like the 4090 and 14900KS. We help users get similar real-world performance for less money.
Why don’t youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't pay youtubers, so they don't praise us. Moreover, our data obstructs youtubers who promote overpriced or inferior products.
Why does UserBenchmark have negative trustpilot reviews?
The 200+ trustpilot reviews are mostly written by virgin marketing accounts. Real users don't give a monkey's about big brands.
Why is UserBenchmark popular with users?
Instead of pursuing brands for sponsorship, we've spent 13 years publishing real-world data for users.
The Best
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $169Nvidia RTX 4060 $293WD Black SN850X M.2 2TB $135
Intel Core i5-12400F $110Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385WD Black SN850X M.2 1TB $75
Intel Core i5-13600K $249Nvidia RTX 4070 $549Crucial T700 M.2 4TB $369
Today's hottest deals
If you buy something via a price link, UserBenchmark may earn a commission
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback