TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Asus H110M-R

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 67%
Battle cruiser
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 53%
Yacht
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (22nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 78 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics102% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive87.5% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (60%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsus H110M-R  (all builds)
Memory9.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20160526
Uptime3 Days
Run DateJun 10 '21 at 17:34
Run Duration114 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 60%

 PC Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-6400-$68
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.7 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (64th percentile)
64.1% Good
Memory 79.1
1-Core 80.1
2-Core 175
64% 111 Pts
4-Core 275
8-Core 337
40% 306 Pts
64-Core 361
22% 361 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑
This bench: 64.1%
 Great: 71%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
Asus(1043 85E5) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 466.63
Performing below potential (1st percentile) - GPU OC Guide
102% Outstanding
Lighting 125
Reflection 190
Parallax 127
102% 147 fps
MRender 118
Gravity 152
Splatting 109
102% 126 fps
Poor: 109% ↑
This bench: 102%
 Great: 133%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Crucial MX500 1TB-$88
89GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 287 310 363 381 394 401 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
87.5% Excellent
Read 465
Write 406
Mixed 392
SusWrite 356
91% 405 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 68.7
4K Mixed 44.2
139% 47.8 MB/s
DQ Read 41.2
DQ Write 105
DQ Mixed 55.9
48% 67.3 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑
This bench: 87.5%
 Great: 125%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD8213.C16FBR2 CT8G4DFS8213.C8FBD1 16GB
2133, 2133 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
64% Good
MC Read 22.9
MC Write 25.6
MC Mixed 20.9
66% 23.1 GB/s
SC Read 12.1
SC Write 21.6
SC Mixed 18
49% 17.2 GB/s
Latency 82.2
49% 82.2 ns
Poor: 40% ↑
This bench: 64%
 Great: 99%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical H110M-R Builds (Compare 3,591 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 22%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 73%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 17%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus H110M-R

CPU
Core i5-7400Intel  $70Bench 64%, 234,266 samples939x
Core i3-7100Intel  $40Bench 57%, 79,299 samples378x
Core i7-7700Intel  $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples275x
GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples531x
HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples344x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia  $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples309x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples248x
A400 480GBKingston  $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples145x
A400 120GBKingston  $28Bench 61%, 166,392 samples122x
RAM
1x8GBAdataBench 41%, 25,310 samples115x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples94x
HyperX 2133 C14 1x8GBKingstonBench 37%, 30,824 samples41x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 89% - Excellent Total price: $157
Why does UserBenchmark have a bad reputation on reddit?
Marketing teams operate large numbers of reddit accounts. When UserBenchmark’s data contradicts their marketing spiel, they deflect by systematically attacking our reputation.
Why don’t large PC brands support UserBenchmark?
PC brands make a lot of their profit from flagship hardware sales: 4090, 14900KS, 7950X3D etc. We help consumers to choose hardware that offers similar real world performance at a fraction of the cost.
Why don’t any youtubers promote UserBenchmark?
We don't sponsor youtubers, so they have no incentive to make positive content about us. Additionally, the brands with weaker products tend to spend more on youtube marketing, which puts their youtubers at odds with UserBenchmark.
Why does UserBenchmark have so many negative trustpilot reviews?
Trustpilot hosts user-generated reviews in an online community that's open and accessible to all. Looking at its 200+ UserBenchmark reviews, which are mostly written by virgin accounts, it is glaringly obvious that they were created by a marketing team. Real users don’t have any time or interest to promote one brand over another.
Why is UserBenchmark so popular with users?
Instead of trying to win lucrative sponsorship deals with billion dollar PC brands, we have spent the last 13 years 100% focussed on providing comprehensive, accurate and relevant information for our users. As a result, most of our users return over and over again because collectively they save millions of dollars every year.
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-12600K $159Nvidia RTX 4060 $280Crucial MX500 250GB $39
Intel Core i5-12400F $120Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-13600K $260Nvidia RTX 4070 $550Samsung 870 Evo 250GB $45
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $48SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $62G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback